2,624
Loading...
Uploader Comments (raconter1)
see all
All Comments (23)
-
@zzzdogutube Hey, Ron! It surely does...the designers held nothing back on this one! It's almost what you might expect George Jetson to drive! Thanks! :) Jack
-
that car makes a statement
-
@newflyer500 Hey, David! Thanks...I agree! :) Jack
-
Very beautiful car.
Loading...
Cars back then were mobile works of art unlike most of todays boring cars.
houseandthensome 2 months ago
@houseandthensome So true...designers had seemingly unlimited freedom of artistic expression! Now they're constrained by miles per gallon! Thanks! :) Jack
raconter1 2 months ago
gorgeous!!!
discocreator76 3 months ago
@discocreator76 I agree...the level of restoration of this car is truly amazing! Thanks! :) Jack
raconter1 3 months ago
that is a nice color Jack. and those wheel covers and wide whites look great together.
at the end of this you start talking about a light... were you saying the trunk had a light inside, but the hood did not? I do not know about the 50's cars but the late 60's chevy's had a light under the hood. small blocks on the left side and big blocks on the right side. they put the light so you could "see" the dip stick to check the oil.
XboobtubeX 8 months ago
@XboobtubeX Hey, Bob! I had to listen to that one again...I was referring to the color of the decklid which was the contrasting white..and the color of the hood, which was blue...I had though the white had carried over to the hood. White understood as light! I have those lights under the hood on my 88 and 72 Mustangs...I miss them on the current models! Thanks! :) Jack
raconter1 8 months ago