The water engines, tesla, and cybernetics. WHY DO WE NOT PUT THE KNOWLEDGE TO USE?!?! because science is not about science, science is about business.
Wind mill system to win over a strong wind so it will not breack, by simply making the proppeler fold it self like a ambrella incase of strong stormy weather?
The sun is one of the primary sources of heat if not the primary source of heat for the Earth. If we, humans, erode our shield against the sun, will the planet warm or cool when more sunlight enters the atomosphere?
CO2 is only a slight, slight Ghg, but true or false would an increase of even a slight Ghg trap more heat in the Earths atomosphere not allowing the heat to escape?
TorF Humans have affected ozone and co2 which in turn affects how the sun interacts with Earth.
UKRentor1605, is 20 and unless he is a prodigy does not have a degree in Physics and CAN NOT be a physicist, even if he is the best in his class at community college.
True or false the solar shield is allowing more radiation to enter the atomosphere.
Tue or false, humans have increase the amount of CO2.
True or false CO2 may not cause warming but has a direct relationship to the temperature on the Earth.
My only caution to you is to not mistake the IPCC and the ICCC saying, "We used information for 10,000 scientists for our study," when they actually discarded the work of most, censored much of what was left, and is edited by some 50 scientists whose personal work is vested in the theory of AGW. Many of the contributing scientists have since come forth saying that they do not agree and their research doesnt agree with the UN censored reports. There is more science to be learned than you think.
And scientists said, "Wait, you guys are charging ahead with this whole global warming thing before we actually have the answer!" Don't bring astrophysicists into the discussion, because as a physicist, you will lose. We are in a historically greater period of sunspots than in much of recorded history. Just because the IPCC, and the ICCC says one thing and climate scientists they supposedly cite as a source for their info say another doesnt mean the UN councils r right and scientists r wrong.
My mom? What are you like 8? Stick to the topic at hand. Your high school style insults have no place in a political or economic debate, and if you think they do, then there is no reason for me to waste any more time debating with someone who barely manages to field the intellectuality of a lemming.
we do not need "renewables" and everybody knows it
weav8060 2 years ago
The water engines, tesla, and cybernetics. WHY DO WE NOT PUT THE KNOWLEDGE TO USE?!?! because science is not about science, science is about business.
nonamist 2 years ago
Wind mill system to win over a strong wind so it will not breack, by simply making the proppeler fold it self like a ambrella incase of strong stormy weather?
Sonyoooo3 2 years ago
The sun is one of the primary sources of heat if not the primary source of heat for the Earth. If we, humans, erode our shield against the sun, will the planet warm or cool when more sunlight enters the atomosphere?
CO2 is only a slight, slight Ghg, but true or false would an increase of even a slight Ghg trap more heat in the Earths atomosphere not allowing the heat to escape?
TorF Humans have affected ozone and co2 which in turn affects how the sun interacts with Earth.
doesitmatter2you 2 years ago
UKRentor1605, is 20 and unless he is a prodigy does not have a degree in Physics and CAN NOT be a physicist, even if he is the best in his class at community college.
True or false the solar shield is allowing more radiation to enter the atomosphere.
Tue or false, humans have increase the amount of CO2.
True or false CO2 may not cause warming but has a direct relationship to the temperature on the Earth.
doesitmatter2you 2 years ago
My only caution to you is to not mistake the IPCC and the ICCC saying, "We used information for 10,000 scientists for our study," when they actually discarded the work of most, censored much of what was left, and is edited by some 50 scientists whose personal work is vested in the theory of AGW. Many of the contributing scientists have since come forth saying that they do not agree and their research doesnt agree with the UN censored reports. There is more science to be learned than you think.
UKRentor1605 2 years ago
And scientists said, "Wait, you guys are charging ahead with this whole global warming thing before we actually have the answer!" Don't bring astrophysicists into the discussion, because as a physicist, you will lose. We are in a historically greater period of sunspots than in much of recorded history. Just because the IPCC, and the ICCC says one thing and climate scientists they supposedly cite as a source for their info say another doesnt mean the UN councils r right and scientists r wrong.
UKRentor1605 2 years ago
My mom? What are you like 8? Stick to the topic at hand. Your high school style insults have no place in a political or economic debate, and if you think they do, then there is no reason for me to waste any more time debating with someone who barely manages to field the intellectuality of a lemming.
psychosavant 2 years ago