Nostalgia Critic: Khan parody (Cuuut!)

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan parody

I'm not Nostalgia Critic and Angry Joe, i'm nobody.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan paródia


Original preview / eredeti videó: http://thatguywiththeglasses.com/videolinks/thatguywiththeglasses/nostalgia-c...

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• thatguywiththeglasses
• Khan
• parody
• paródia
• Nostalgia
• Critic
• Angry
• Joe
• preview
• Star
• Trek
• the
• movie
• mozi
• film
• cut

[RTSFirebat]

Angry Joe as Khan? This is win!

[DianaGohan]

@Spiner1105

Well as he said at the start of Star Trek one and even at the end of the Santa Claus movie he's reviewing the ODD NUMBER Star Trek films because those are supposedly all the bad ones and he isn't going to review the actually good or enjoyable ST films since that isn't something NC really does anyway. You know full reviews of really good films.

[PSNGreyLynx]

@DarkPhoenixMishima would apply well

[DarkPhoenixMishima]

I honestly thought, during my first watching of this, that Doug said CUUUNT.

[PSNGreyLynx]

also there's many forms oof art, I view art as either great emotional depth or great psychological depth, neither star track has or has attempted to have had in any medium before or after motion picture as NG - Voyager was about characters behaving professionally with some moments of thoguh full characterization, Original ST was about the exploration then the characters(who were overdramatic in their acting)

[PSNGreyLynx]

@AspergianMind everyone has their faults even "The greatest director of all time", the thing is just because you're sci-fi doesn't=art, the meaning of the script itself, the cinematography and the direction are all suppose to protray things left to "artistic interruption", the script and acting obiviously are suppose to be about an action scifi epic, the slow pans break up everything.Also I meant to say "It was about the action and drama not about the arstriness" my bad,

[AspergianMind]

@PSNGreyLynx Well ST:MP was directed by Robert Wise among the greatest directors of that time, not forgetting his share of sci-fi, so how come he didnt get the 'artistic interpretation' seal of approval?

Never been about drama or action? So why would the dose of the opposite be any different? I could argue alone that the characters at least had presence and you could emote with them, while 2001 was devoid of human content, which ironically is leaving the greater artistic element.

[PSNGreyLynx]

@AspergianMind difference is 2001 is all about artistic interpretation, the fact that Star Trek before hand had never been about that the drama of the story and the action of the story and rarely had one single panning shot for anything close to 2 minutes nor was it's script going for that (just it's cinematography) make it noticeable and seem unneeded and stupid

[AspergianMind]

I dont understand how 2001: A Space Odyssey can be called a masterpiece and those who cant the stretches of...nothing happening....arent smart, sophisticated enough, etc.

...but this gets panned for the reasons and no one defends it.

I mean theyre literally the same movies, except Star Trek: The Motion Picture has a lot more substance going for it. Some sense of characters, actual scope than just empty space, and a lush music score by Jerry Goldsmith than just a compilation of classical music.

[TheDarkNeonHero]

@Spiner1105 NC didn't touch on the Second one cause...well there was no need to. it was good. he was only doing the odd numbered ones, which are infamous for being...justly named odd or stupid.

[rosserm11]

CUUUUUUUUT!!!!!!!?!