LFTR vs Cancer - medical isotopes molybdenum-99 & bismuth-213
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like Thorium Remix's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike Thorium Remix's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add Thorium Remix's video to your playlist.
Uploaded on Oct 6, 2011
Sign the petition! http://ThoriumPetition.com - We are about to shut down the one reactor in Canada that is making molybdenum-99 for medical purposes in 2015. There are hundreds of thousands of patients that will not be able to get their molybdenum-99 that they need for diagnostic procedures when that happens. LFTR produces molybdenum-99 in normal course of operation and can be partitioned very easily.
-
Category
-
License
Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)
- Created using YouTube Video Editor
- Source videos Loading... View attributions
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
The interactive transcript could not be loaded.
Loading...
Loading...
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Loading...
-
5:06
LFTRs in 5 minutes - Thorium Reactorsby 123ross456Featured
886,324
-
1:59:59
Thorium: An energy solution - THORIUM REMIX 2011by gordonmcdowell
393,068 views
-
7:48
LFTR vs Nuclear Waste - Plutonium, americium, curium (transuranics) can be fissioned / disposedby Thorium Remix
11,401 views
-
1:31
King of Tonga (King George Tupou V) interested in nuclear energy - Thorium Remix 2011 [cut scene]by Thorium Remix
2,083 views
-
32:54
Milo Hron - Czech Republic Development of Molten Fluoride Liquid Fuel Nuclear Reactor @ ThEC12by gordonmcdowell
676 views
-
67
videos
Play all
Nuclear Power-Liquid Thorium Fuel-Good!by K4Fusion
-
1:25:24
20120510 - LFTR, what nuclear could have beenby SmartScarecrow
1,823 views
-
2:09
Kirk quotes George Monbiot on Caroline Lucas refusal to support thorium ( / LFTR / MSR ) researchby Thorium Remix
679 views
-
1:37:13
Kirk Sorensen @ MRU on LFTR - Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactorsby gordonmcdowell
30,485 views
-
1:41
Thorium in a CANDU / Solid Fuel Reactor - THORIUM REMIX cut sceneby Thorium Remix
883 views
-
15:16
Thorium, Heavy Rare Earths, China & the Loss of Hi-Tech Manufacturing Jobsby Thorium Remix
13,877 views
-
5:24
Rare Earths and Thorium - James Kennedy extended scene from THORIUM REMIXby Thorium Remix
589 views
-
8:53
Eigenharp demonstrationby eigenlabs
190,174 views
-
3:56
Bismuth - Periodic Table of Videosby periodicvideos
163,300 views
-
16:45
Robert Hargraves - Aim High! @ TEAC3by gordonmcdowell
6,550 views
-
4:18
Are ETF Silver Bars Fake? Made out of Molybdenum?by RainstormGB
3,404 views
-
7:31
Thorium @ House of Lords 2011-07-07 Baroness Smith vs Lord Marlandby Thorium Remix
7,850 views
-
1:10
The Thorium Dream (Trailer)by MotherboardTV
65,383 views
-
8:20
Integral Fast Reactor Introductionby Daniel Krasnodar
3,485 views
-
25:03
Save the Uranium-233, Explore Space, Save Livesby GoogleTechTalks
12,874 views
-
3:14
Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors (LFTR): Energy for the Future?by scishow
156,945 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
enthalpy 1 year ago
I think LFTR is a great technology (I am a nuclear engineer btw). We do have a US plant (Clinton) which will be producing about 1/2 of the U.S.'s supply moly-99 in about 2 years from now. I think its only 1 of 2 US nuclear plants which its actually viable to do this on (due to the GE Mark-3 Containment).
At the least it will be a hold-over until LFTR and other advanced reactor technologies reach fruition.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (3)
Dick Douglas 3 months ago
Be careful with cancer cures. They tend to be considered "COMPLETELY VERBOTEN" amongst the chemo/radiation industry. Just ask Rick Simpson or Ernest T. Krebs.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
ThyrmBloodaxe 1 year ago
this is absolutely fascinating. i am torn between biological sciences (as in, all of them) and chemistry/nuclear chemistry/nuclear physics/nuclear engineering. but it appears they converge at points.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube