Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Is the Income Tax based on Fraud? Come and hear an IRS whistle-blower in person - Joe Banister

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
4,748
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 4, 2008

Joe Banister was a Certified Public Accountant who went to work for the IRS as a Special Agent of the Criminal Investigation Division, specializing in Fraud Detection as a fraud expert. Mr. Banister traveled frequently to Washington D.C. to debate the government representatives, about the legality of the Federal Income Tax. Mr. Banister will share the reasons that he quit the IRS after they had failed to show him any law that requires American citizens to file returns or pay income taxes. In addition, in 2004 the IRS criminally charged Mr. Banister with several "tax-crimes" to put an end to whistle-blowing activities. However, the jury found Mr. Banister innocent of all charges. Come and hear how this living American hero of the people has stood up to the criminal organization known as the IRS. Please visit Mr. Banister's web site at www.freedomabovefortune.com

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • had to reload it several times kept saying video not available, FUCK OFF YOUTUBE STOP CENSORING VIDEOS

  • Every tax imposed in the Code has three necessary elements. 1. The subject of the tax is identified. 2. The amount of tax is given. And 3. The person "LIABLE" is identified. If any one of these elements are missing from the equation, then no tax can be collected. The I.R. Code imposes just over 2 dozen taxes. All have these three elements. Subtitle "A" is the income tax. Sec.1 imposes the tax on taxable income and provides rates of tax. Sec. 1461 identifies who is "LIABLE". See for yourself.

see all

All Comments (28)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • At approximately 2 p.m. on the 14th floor of the Federal Court Building in Sacramento, California, Joe Banister supporters got word that the judge had received a note from the jury and quickly moved from the hallway into the courtroom. He announced that the jury had reached a unanimous decision.

    The verdicts were read by the clerk of the court with Judge William Shubb presiding: "Not Guilty", "Not Guilty", "Not Guilty", "Not Guilty".

  • @seraphimra Imcome is money you make off you 401k and stuff like that .Work or you job is called Trade, Imcome the word was put in the place of trade.Trade skill's thats wer u trade work+skills for money.Ther is no tax on a trade think about it how can u tax a trade on value.You can put a flat tax on all trades like we trade cars but not work.I may be high as hell atm but i pretty sure in rite.

  • @almartin77 that section sayes that the person that is witholding is liable. the employer is liable but not the person there taking it from is not.

  • @RetSquid Thanks for shedding truth on these ignorant tax-deniers.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more