GENEPAX WATER ENERGY SYSTEM
Top Comments
All Comments (29)
-
@The4LA2Baker0 It takes energy to break bonds, and a lot of energy when you're electrolysing water- oh wait, the last five people said that.
Also, citation needed on your argument.
-
@shanghaikidx I chalk the lack of understanding of even the basics of the scientific method to the downward spiral of education not only in the U.S. but abroad. I keep hearing the phrase Idiocracy" and understanding the context of it, the term hits the nail on the head in a more subtle way.
Genepax closed its doors because extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. It was obvious they didn't have any, so they went the way of every other crank.
-
High school chemistry 101: It takes energy to break bonds.
-
@frank0067 Canada, in 2nd place to the US in stupid Utube comments.
-
@The4LA2Baker0 There must be energy involved in making the 'plates'.
Water is a very stable molecule, and it wont split easily, the plates must be very reactive.
-
@mrduffy1100 Research it. Its a chemical process. The "plates" have to be replaced, but there is no energy input required.
-
@The4LA2Baker0 This system must use energy to split the water molecule.
-
@elcruels Typical stupid fucking U.S.reply. Go and read a chemistry book.
-
Ciao vorrei sapere se è possibile contattare il produttore di questa Vettura ....per commercializzarla anche in Italia saluti da ......Mi
-
Clearly you naysayers haven't done ANY research. I hate to be the one to break this to you troglodytes, but this is a real technology. Take 10 minutes and do the smallest amount of research, but you have to take your head out of your ass first.
It remains a mystery to me, how people can "argue" with their brain being amputated:
- Of course they do not think for one second, otherwise they could find that in history 1000s so called Perpetuum Mobile existed & none of them worked.
- they take a YT video (!!!) as scientific evidence
- they apparently do not like or ignore any scientific methodology, but do not care either if a proof has given empirically and are not interested in why none of the so-called "free energy" "inventions: worked
shanghaikidx 3 years ago 3
so.....am i to understand that these really smart sounding responses were written by people that actually dont know that this technology has been around for like...20 years?.....more actually......this is hardly fringe....its just suppressed like everything else good on this earth............even sarcasm......peace..........~el cruels
elcruels 3 years ago 2