Why the NIST report on WTC7 is unscientific and false

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
14,400
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 15, 2010

Over 1,000 Professional Architects and Engineers agree that the mysterious collapses of WTC Building 7 and the Twin Towers on 9/11/01 need to be re-examined and investigated. The NIST report is proven to be unscientific and false, using evidence NIST either ignored or gathered and used itself.

I used the public domain video created by NIST, available here:
http://www.youtube.com/user/usnistgov
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PK_iBYSqEsc

NIST in their own words admits free fall speed:
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.html
"Stage 2 (1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)"

The NIST WTC Investigation -- How Real Was The Simulation? by Eric Douglas, Architect
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200612/NIST-WTC-Investigation.pdf

FireFighters for 9/11 Truth:
NFPA 921 on High Order Damage:
http://firefightersfor911truth.org/?p=221

Shear Studs: A Case Study:
http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/sixty-state-street/construction...

Van Ramiro's SuperThermite experiment was courtesy of Jesse Ventura's "Conspiracy Theory" TV Show on TruTv (formerly CourtTV) from Episode 2 on 9/11 Conspiracy Theories.

Technical Papers on 9/11 collapse up for peer review @ http://www.AE911truth.org

Physical Chemistry of Thermite, Thermate, Iron-Alum-Rich Microspheres at Demise of WTC 1 & 2 Jerry Lobdill 6/15/2007
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/JLobdillThermiteChemistryWTC

9/11 Physics Problems:
WTC 7: A Short Computation Prof. Kenneth L. Kuttler
http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/W7Kuttler.pdf

The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis
By Prof. Graeme MacQueen and Tony Szamboti
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2008/TheMissingJolt7.pdf

NIST Report on WTC 7 dissected by Engineers:
http://ae911truth.org/docs/J_Cole_NIST_WTC7_PUBLIC_COMMENTS_FINAL_PKG_9-11-08...

Lies about the WTC by NIST and Underwriters Laboratories
Kevin Ryan - U.L. whistleblower - former Site Manager
http://www.911review.com/articles/ryan/lies_about_wtc.html

A useful 9/11 collapse simulator:
http://femr2.ucoz.com/

  • likes, 11 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (AlienScientist)

  • @nadoeloiskat,

    Please read the article by Kevin Ryan call "Demolition Access to the WTC Towers", it is a very extensive 4 part paper complete with sources.

Top Comments

  • @heafers84,

    Made up? No the idea that Fire symmetrically demolished 3 skyscrapers in one day is made up... For one, it's never happened before or since.

    The evidence for thermite comes from careful investigations into the evidence from 9/11. All the evidence points to thermite. I'm not being gullible, I'm being rationale and scientific, unlike the morons who believe that office fires could have done this kind of damage. Nothing aside from thermite, can explain the temperatures and molten iron.

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (341)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @grindkerensky i hear you on ur rage. However, they completely ignored the national fire investigation procedures in this case. They test for exotic accelerants in house fires, but not here? The steel was taken away and destroyed, why? In the fire investigation manual it states, if motlen or melted steel or concrete is observed, it must be assumed that exotic accelerants have been used. This is standard procedure, yet not followed. It was like many things on 9/11, the first time it happened.

  • @AlienScientist

    Alienscientist.... Thanks...

  • Yes,,Debunk this,,Sundar,,in fact go back to whatever 3rd World country You came from, and investigate Cave and Camel fires!!!!!

  • @nadoeloiskat So because a 911 sceptic admits to not being all knowing and having all the answers makes him not trustworthy? Its like saying Ill keep believing in the windgod because nobody can explain to me where wind comes from.

  • 8 People from NIST disliked this.

  • Shame Sunder

  • if the steel was weakened by the fires on 911 how come the concrete be polverised as well.truth

  • @nadoeloiskat idiot

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more