Evidence against Evolution and for Creation
Uploader Comments (MalcolmBowden)
Top Comments
-
Are you joking?
There are NUMEROUS Peer-Reviewed Journals supporting Intelligent Design. Link 10 around the bottom of my page will take you to all of them, with reference sources to the journals and publications the ID articles 1st appeared in.
Dr. Gordon C. Mills, Dr. Michael Denton, Dr. Jonathan Wells, and Dr. Stephen Meyer are just a few that have published science articles supporting ID. There is no conspiracy, the scientific community knows evo-theory is garbage.
-
@MalcolmBowden Thompson is talking about Kirk Hansen's MODEL of the Earth Moon-system which assumed one big continent which made the problem easier to solve but it was incomplete. It didn't include plate tectonics for example. And after that Thompson talks about better models which include plate tectonics and describe the system much better.
All Comments (58)
-
@evoTARDSareINSANE LOL, ID is a joke, just get over it. You're an animal, nothing special. The entire universe wasn't created to test you and if pass, you get to praise god for eternity.
-
Simple question. Where are YOU published?
-
Evolution didn't happen once. Next time you get a vaccine go ahead and tell the doctor to give you one from 1952 because it only happened once. HELLO MCKFLY! It's happening right now. you are a transitional form.
-
WOW the big question is very illogical let alone unsound. Evolution in no way discredits the belief in an afterlife or God existing. It is the simple observation of life gradually changing overtime due to mutations and environmental pressure. On the other side, just because a God created us does not logically imply that there is an afterlife or a "final showdown." It's one thing to have the content of your argument incorrect. It's another thing to have the logic invalid. FAIL!
-
What a load of complete and utter rubbish!
The "evidences" given in the video may sound as if they are being given by a well educated man to those who want to believe - but anyone who genuinely does have an education would know that "specie" is NOT a singular form of "species".
-
@MalcolmBowden Now you are just ignoring the fossil evidence, trying to focus the point on something else and dodging my question. I will repeat: We have precambrian fossils! We have fossils that show for example speciation and formation of the mammalian middle ear! And finally where are Cambrian Tetrapods?
It's a lie that layers before Cambrian don't have fossils. For example in Ediacara layers there are multicellular organisms.
Tippitapitus 1 month ago
@Tippitapitus I assume that they ARE below the Cambrian, but it only requires part of the Great Flood of Noah to trap some local sea creatures prior to the later mass engulfment of many more. You must NOT ignore the fact that they are ALL fully developed complex CREATURES, SUDDENLY appearing as they do in the Cambrian. There are NO part developed creatures before them. Dont talk of "billions of years" because SOME part developed fossils should be there - and they are NOT. M. Bowden
MalcolmBowden 1 month ago
@MalcolmBowden Ediacara is below Cambrian and it's dated older but multicellular organisms can be found in Mesoproterozoic Era which is much older than Ediacara or Cambrian. There are precambrian fossils but due to their lack of hard body parts they rarely fossilize. Where are all the Cambrian tetrapods if all fully developed creatures suddenly appear?
Valentine et al. 1999. Fossils, molecules and embryos: new perspectives on the Cambrian explosion. Development 126:851-859.
Tippitapitus 1 month ago
@Tippitapitus You say "There are precambrian fossils but due to their lack of hard body parts they rarely fossilize". Just like Punctuated Equilibrium; "Evolution happened so fast in small areas that it left no fossils of the changes." i.e. "We have a theory but the evidence is missing" If creationists used arguments like this we would rightly be ridiculed. The most preposterous arguments are used to defend the indefensible theory of evolution to avoid God. Shame on you all.
MalcolmBowden 1 month ago
@MalcolmBowden They RARELY fossilize. We have precambrian fossils! We also have fossils that show speciation and formation of new structures.
Benton et al. (2001). Speciation in the fossil record. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16:405-411
Takechi, M. ja Kuratani, S. (2010). History of Studies on Mammalian
Middle Ear Evolution: A Comparative Morphological and Developmental Biology Perspective. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 314B:417–433.
Tippitapitus 1 month ago
@Tippitapitus I will not be obtaining your refs. EVERY paper by an evolutionist I have ever read has flaws in the arguments. For a classic case go to the link trueorigin(dot)org/moonmb(dot)asp
They had to make the ridiculous claim all land was either around the poles or the equator for many years in order to get enough time for the present position of the moon. Evolutionists have slammed my article but my main thesis still stands.
MalcolmBowden 1 month ago