2nd Plane Hits: New Fairbanks FBI audio release 2011

Audio found on the new NIST website thanks to MrKoenig1985 at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWXXKDaACfY -- This video used audio from that and non-redacted video from the 911datasets.org release 25 version without audio (faces blanked out by FBI not here).

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• WTC
• towers
• September 11
• plane hits
• plane crash
• 9/11 footage
• rare
• new
• September 11 attacks
• World Trade Center

[IExposeMormonism]

Humans are so gullible. We're in so much trouble. No plane in 110 years of aviation ever crashed like this one:: No torsional rotation, no pieces break off, at every moment of Penetration the plane produces no fire, only a gray "poof", The fuselage shows no damage to the remaining section prior to entry, the wing tips, edges, tail and all enter smoothly and seamlessly. Definitely not a production line Boeing. The Pentagon plane wings are just the opposite! They fold in, leaving a 14ft hole!

[Sandberg1972]

@brokenstyx I feel sorry for u because u're too proud or too stupid or too ignorant to recognize the vast body of evidence supporting the controlled demolition hypothesis.

Claiming there's no evidence for it is just pathetic willfull ignorance, also indicating u have very little knowledge about laws of physics, about the scientific method and about history in general. U wouldn't recognize a cover-up if it bit u in the ass.

That's why I feel sorry for u.

But u knew that already, right? ;)

[brokenstyx]

@geiuy

Which part of the official explanation do you doubt? i look into the facts that we have access to, and the fact is the CIA covered up their reasons for protecting the hijackers in the US, and the President covered up the backing of the hijackers by Saudi Arabia. they're the facts. simply disbelieving the official theory because of a general paranoia does not explain what happened. some of us are interested in what happened.

[geiuy]

@brokenstyx Don't waste energy on the supposed controlled demolition or missile on the pentagon.look for the facts not theories.So,if u want to look into the facts of how secret services and governments work take your time to study "operation gladio","operation northwood" and the "emad salem and fbi planning of the 1993 wtc attacks".Those are proven facts not conspiracy theories.Once you have studied those i'm sure you would no longer believe the 9 11 official explanation

[brokenstyx]

@Sandberg1972

you feel sorry for me? because you have no evidence of controlled demolition? ok cool - thanks for the sympathy, it doesn't substitute evidence though.

[Sandberg1972]

@brokenstyx I feel sorry for u, that's all I can say.

Good luck...

[MrKoenig1985]

Nice idea to put the unblurred "NIST video" with "FBI audio" together.

Thanks. Very well done.

[muskduh]

Google 911GATE.

[FreedumbFighter28]

I did not set out to provide you any evidence for anything, nor did you prove it was fire with your guessing and assertions. You lack facts to support your guess work. So....I would say your theory holds about as much weight as a NO PLANERS theories.You NEED people to assume the unlikely ( fire ),just like a no planer needs you to assume there were no planes. Both theories are not backed up by any science. They are just products of ones persons wild imagination and guess work

[brokenstyx]

@FreedumbFighter28

When i pointed out that there is no evidence of controlled demolition, you didn't reply with reams of evidence for controlled demolition. That option isn't available to you because there is no evidence of controlled demolition.