HAWX F22 VS SU47

No description available.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• F22
• SU
• 47
• HAWX

[AJSokrates]

Stupid video!

First thing is that Su-47 in total is worse then F22 in this game in Air-to-Air both are best planes and have 5 stars.

Computer is stupid and I can prove you that I can shot 4 computer F22 with one Su47...

[realrussky]

they are just stupid bots. nothing to proud.

[MrBlafhert]

How much epic fail sound men can add on a YT video.

[JVC7400]

@AJSokrates You know, you are way off when you say the EF2000 is better in war scenario, the Americans found out before building F-15 (big) F-16 (Small) that it was best to have fighters to deal with only one type of buisness. The russians did the same, Su-27 and Mig-29. While the EF2000 has to do both jobs the F22 could do Air-to-Air, nailing the EF2000, and F35 doing multirole

[JVC7400]

@AJSokrates You know, you are way off when you say the EF2000 is better in war scenario, the Americans found out before building F-15 (big) F-16 (Small) that it was best to have fighters to deal with only one type of buisness. The russians did the same, Su-27 and Mig-29. While the EF2000 has to do both jobs the F22 could do Air-to-Air, nailing the EF2000, and F35 doing multirole.

[JVC7400]

@AJSokrates Well the Su-47 is a technology demonstrator, it is not capable of carying weapons. So putting it in this game makes it wrong. F-22 is much better than the Flanker series. However the newer russian T-50 is probably just as good as the Raptor.

[Hatinonthehaters]

F-22 Craptor.... /watch?v=KaoYz90giTk....

[AJSokrates]

@armydude162

I think China would pwned US and Russia at once.

Russia would be hard deal but US is nothing for them.

You know that China have tons of bonds from USA. And if they will put them on market US will be bankrupt.

So thats why US dont want to help South Korea in fight against North Korea (NK is ally of China).

However China make tons of money on US so they maybe dont need them but it good to have US still "alive" ;)

USA is huge market!

[armydude162]

@AJSokrates also i think we can both agree that the su-47 is a piece of shit.

p.s. im not saying the eurofighter is bad, in fact i think it is an awesome plane, just i personally prefer the F-22

[armydude162]

@AJSokrates one problem in your theory the f-22 isn't ONLY air to air and it is better air to air than the eurofighter typhoon. that is the reason why the f-22 costs more because the f-22 had a 4.5 -1 kill ratio in tests. due to its better manueverability, thrust vectoring and stealth.

So basically it would take out 4 eurofighters before it is picked up on radar, and due to its rectagluar engines it also has an extremely low heat signature. so it may cost 2 times more but, if it kills 4...

[AJSokrates]

@armydude162

hahaha you are funny.

F22 have so much problems with everthing... And it is also too expensive.

F22 and Su47 are crap because they are only air-air.

Eurofighter would destroy both of them during war...

You know why? Because it is easier to build and it cost 2 time less and it is not so worse than other planes...

US did right thing building F22 but they shouldnt use it often. They should make more F15 and upgrade them. And I see you are from US and you think US is most powerful.

[armydude162]

@AJSokrates hey fucking moron too bad 4 su-47s dont even exist. btw the f-22 is better than the su-47 seeing as the su-47 was unstable due to its reversed wings. and not to mention that it never left the prototype stage. retard