WTC 9/11

9/11

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• WTC
• 911
• conspiracy

[pecm]

Really? well, good for you, although by believing in this cr@p you are already 'wasting your energy'...

High cinetic energy pulverises concrete, stone and &, whether you want it or not.

[alienspacecentereast]

You quote: "with the amount of energy invoved, the concrete was simply pulverized", and with that statement from you, I won´t waste my energy...

[pecm]

(A little late to answer, but here it goes)

Ok, but so what? with the amount of energy invoved, the concrete was simply pulverized. And I know how a controled demolition looks like, the concrete is also pulverised, and not because of the explosives.

And this was a demolition too, just not a controlled one.

Now I ask you, do you know the main visible difference between a controlled demolition and WTC@9-11?

[Nergon]

You sir are a dumb ass... They can fall as fast as they fall in air because you seem to have forgotten that millions of tons of materials where crashing and pushing them swiftly tword the earth....

[alienspacecentereast]

No you misunderstood my friend. Pataki said there were no concrete to see, very little, not that there wasen´t enough concrete...

[pecm]

Hello (only now have I saw this), if I understand right, you are saying that there wasn't enough concrete on the buildings to form those dust clouds, and so just because there was concrete dust, that's a sign of explosives? why would they put concrete for the explosives in the 1st place? Yes, a big part was aluminum, glass and other metals, but you're forgetting the concrete from the floors/ceilings, some walls, stairs, and the concrete surrounding the big core where the elevators were.

[alienspacecentereast]

This is taken out of the blue. On the internet, there is a lot of junk but if you don´t know about it, you can´t prevent it. On the internet you have the opportunity to look at a case from several different angles and get a lot of aspects to it. You can´t see the lies if you don´t know them! By the way, there is an ocean of information sources on the internet and not all of them use the hole day to SPAM the world with lies...

[alienspacecentereast]

That was a lot, but let me take up the pulverized concrete. That is strong evidence of the use of explosives. No matter what, there would be a dustcloud, but please, you know how a controlled demolition of concrete buildings looks like.!? As George Pataki, Governor of New York said it, then he was interviewed by CNN onsite; "there is no concrete, very little concrete, all you see is aluminum and steel". You can see this interview in my video "9/11 Explosive Reminder 2009"...

[pecm]

(cont.)

Something like that would make profit, believe me, if only would be true. But the evidences don't hold much, and they don't want to loose credibility. Fox tried that, and loosed it a little :P

[pecm]

Hello again. I'm sorry to disagree (again) but the internet is one of the least reliable sources, simply because there is a little of everything to everyone, and anyone can write anything on their site. And exactlly because the mass media want profit, the conspiracy theory would sell, *allot*. It has conspiracy (that alone sells, always), treason, scandal, 'shadow ops', whatever. (cont)