Dr. David Berlinski: Transitional Sequence (Clip 4)
Top Comments
All Comments (82)
-
@kobasica Is your community a bunck of uneducated religious fuddymentalists?
Evololution was accepted 150 years ago when the found the first transitional fossils.
-
Third Generation of SOFT DRINK , DRINKER lot of TOXINS in HIS BRAIN
-
"This is why darwinians are a laughing stock in my comunity."- I think your ignorant hooting is easily drowned out by the science community laughing at creationists. berlinski has nothing resembling a valid argument and neither do you. keep laughing.....idiot.
-
@toobsucker Why do you think you know how evolution works? You have never studied it ! You don't understanD it so it is easy for you to make a STRAWMAN ARGUMENT.
1. Yes that exactly what Darwinian evolution predicts... NO IT DOES NOT.
2. (atheistic evolution) starts with chemical reactions ... NO, EVOLUTION IS ABOUT SPECIES.
3. the entire system must be subject to evolution OR genome is conserved (not subject to evolutionary mechanisms). YOU ARE MAKING SHIT UP.
-
@gregrutz "Evolution does not say thing have to change, why can't creatards understand this?"
Yes that exactly what Darwinian evolution predicts, what do you think evolution means?. Methodological naturalism (atheistic evolution) starts with chemical reactions and the entire system must be subject to evolution.
Evolutions glaring problem is most of the genome is conserved (not subject to evolutionary mechanisms). Why do you think 500myo living fossils have not changed?.
Conserved elements
-
@toobsucker Evolution does not say thing have to change, why can't creatards understand this? You, like all creationists, don't understand evolution. A transitional species is one that has the traits of 2 different kinds of animals>> a fish with a neck or legs. A dinosaurs with teeth, boney tail and Feathers. A land animal with a whales ear. Scientists have found all these ''missing links''
-
@kobasica Bull shit, Mr. Butinski does not have any evidence, he is just a paid IDiot.
This man brings up valid arguments and evo fundies scoff at them, such blatant ignorance, its hilarious. This is why darwinians are a laughing stock in my comunity.
kobasica 2 years ago 68
Guess what.
I could take EVERY SINGLE LIVING FOSSIL
And find a very similar looking species and put it next to it and "PROVE EVOLUTION"
And ALL you Darwinian heads would believe its a transitional and proof of evolution
1) Living fossils prove things don't changes of long periods of time.
2) A species that looks ALMOST like a living fossil PROVES similar looking species DON'T prove evolution.
How is it you evolutionists don't get this?
toobsucker 2 years ago 29