Previous owner reveals Council hard-cored Dale Farm..
Top Comments
All Comments (89)
-
There standing in PISS!
-
@Flamorgan Show me where they admitted putting the hardcore down because if that's true then Bocking would sue there asses off,but it aint true that's why he lost 40 times in court.and dont use that anti Irish bullshit,there hated because there criminals.
-
@Flamorgan The contractor is not the council you should know that and they can prosecute Bocking and the contractor if it was necessary.As i said they did it 40 times so they acted lawfully.
-
@Flamorgan “Mr Bocking’s claims that the council laid hardcore in the green belt at the former scrap yard site are completely untrue and without any basis.The Council served 40 enforcement notices against Mr Bocking in July 1992 for the laying of hardcore, roads and permanent structures, and he lost all of his planning appeals in May 1994. The Council would not have been able to serve enforcement notices or defended itself on appeal in May 1994 if Mr Bocking’s claims were true.
-
@Flamorgan The council put out a statement and there version of events checks out,the guy appeared in court and lost 40 times.
-
@Flamorgan Can you not see any difference between storing cars on a site and 50 gypsy families living on a site..... The status of the land is greenbelt, any illegal activity does not change that. these Irish travellers are not poor people they are property developers. They own other property in the UK, Ireland, and Europe Why do you think they refused council houses?
-
and now carruthers has imported some bats and droppings in an attempt to pervert the course of justice? ...
-
@Flamorgan The council did not break the law, storing cars is a tempory thing, and if anyone complained they would have removed them. to say this gives the travellers the right to abuse planning laws is a plain stupid.
-
Why did all the posh cambridge graduate 'Activists' like Natalie Fox leave the site yesterday before the eviction started? Because daddy's solicitor advised them that anyone who was resisting the eviction was committing a criminal offence - they just encouraged the others and thought they'd get off to return to Cambridge - but isn't incitement a criminal offence? Their website is still encouraging people to go down there even a day after the police were forced to go in .....
@woopwoopxxx Because there is a scrap yard or any other business or building on greenbelt land does not alter the greenbelt status of the land. There are many houses and business`s within the greenbelt. To get planning permissin on these sites is virtually impossible for ordinary people, but travellers have had some success in the past because of their gypsy status. When planning is refused they should obey the law.
williamorwell 5 months ago 13
So these travelers have now got there buddy to turn up and say the council hard cored it,but it turns out that dispute has been going on for decades since the 60s with no one being able to prove the council did the work because no paper work exists for any council works or vehicle's entering that site.though the council served the previous owner with enforcement notices in 92 and 94.I take it those notices are to do with planning so still looks like the council are right here.
keir100 5 months ago 8