Exhibit R + Alisons Redford's Government Coverup of LawLIARs Pack of Lies...

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
789 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 19, 2009

Please view My blog: http://complainttocjc.blogspot.com/

Rhonda Sails's Ambush of Exhibit R. I was ambushed with fresh new Exhibits M to R that could not be adduced into Trial. Justice Horner did not want me knowing what these Exhibits were before having to answer to them. Karen Horner assaulted me for My medically documented memory funtion and recent recall problems caused by MS-Muliple Sclerosis. She let Rhonda Sails ambush me in the Witness Box and refused to allow me to view the Exhibits before having to answer to them.

Justice Horner did not want me knowing about new Exhibits before having to answer to them. She made certain I was confused.

Karen Horner did not Respect me as a Witness and Evidence. She deprived me of the Law - "An Act Respecting Witnesses & Evidence", The Canada Evidence Act states:

Notice of production of book or document

28. (1) No copy of any book or other document shall be admitted in evidence, under the authority of section 23, 24, 25, 26 or 27, on any trial, unless the party intending to produce the copy has before the trial given to the party against whom it is intended to be produced reasonable notice of that intention.

Not less than 7 days

(2) The reasonableness of the notice referred to in subsection (1) shall be determined by the court, judge or other person presiding, but the notice shall not in any case be less than seven days.

Click to view the CEAc-5 website at; http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/showdoc/cs/C-5///en?page=1

Karen Horner stepped over the Alberta Rule of Court 158.5(1)(e). Because Rhonda Sails's Exhibits M to R were never produced into the action

Click to View Alberta Rule of Court 158.5(1)(e) at; http://www.canlii.org/en/ab/laws/regu/alta-reg-390-1968/44242/alta-reg-390-19...

Rhonda Sails's Exhibits M to R:
M - http://scexhibitm.blogspot.com/
N - http://scexhibitn.blogspot.com/
O - http://scexhibito.blogspot.com/
P - http://scexhibitp.blogspot.com/
Q - http://scexhibitq.blogspot.com/
R - http://scexhibitr.blogspot.com/

Click here to see the truth and Lie that LawLIAR Michael Dolan's had McMan/Rob Rehm fabricate at; http://heidisavesthetruthtg.blogspot.com/

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (eachtem)

  • Justice deLayed is Justice denied. Alexander PARK too... did therule 3-0 , I don't know how it works in Canada, but under common Law, Appeal courts can not USUALLY look at "New" evidence not in the original case on file with the Clerk of Court, and in the body of the original case. This sounds like a TRIAL court, not

    an appeals court. but no I could not hear a laugh.

  • I'm not quite sure if it was 3-0 or what. Judgment was reserved and sent in the mail. i did make application to adduce a new Exhibit. The 3judge appeal panel came up with a fictional judgment wiht mostly of facts that never existed, which is why their judgement was a complete Fraud. That will be put in point by piont step by step detail in my next video due by this weekend. Just wait for the next one.

  • our justicer system is meant to put millions upon millions in jail for great parts of there lives...

  • Thanks. I would dare them to try to lay bogus charges on me again.

Top Comments

  • Awesome Video. I agree 100% with u ...God bless you my friend

  • I agree with you 100%

see all

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • In most cases the abuse of the families by Alberta Children's Services and by the family court system in Alberta does in fact have a system of cahoots. It is called the Alberta Response Model. The interactive teams permit a series of abuses against any person who disagrees with any of them. In the case of trial by ambush or delayed disclosure does not allow the parent to provide answer. In most cases the abuse of the parent is permitted by the use of perjury decided as the trial approaches.

  • ppl just did not get what bush meant to the world when he stated "your either w/us or your not." yes just what hitler said and this is the way we are headed right now. crimes by the state or gov.? forget it! all under the covder of the new world order laws. you have yet to hear how the officials of cape cod used my children in retaliation for speaking out in newspaper yrs. before. all our stories amount to personal horror which goes well witrh the shock and awe gov. issued.

  • Mobile AL Juvenile Injustic System did the same thing to me and my children..and covered their missdeeds by literally CHANGING THE COURT RECORDS months after the fact & utterly disreguarding the Constitution, Bill of Rights, Federal, State, & Local laws as well....

    Good Luck. From what I have experienced & learned, Canada & US both have well established Child Trafficking Systems Set up..and We All need all the help we can get...

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more