@MarkSDCA Take a look at ULPower's engines. Lighter than Rotax and natively fuel-injected as well as FADEC-controlled. I think they're MUCH better than Rotax.
@MetaView7 If you look around you'll find some pretty good contenders. DeltaHawk for one. Don't forget that 100VLL and Swift fuel and nearing approval, if not achieving it already.
@ChgoSTrider Are you an aircraft mechanic, or aeronautical engineer? How much heavier is a liquid-cooled engine versus one that isn't, given the same performance characteristics? How much better does a non-liquid cooled engine perform, over a liquid-cooled engine, without the liquid cooling operating? And where will the radiator go, in the same spot as the oil ( or even hydraulic ) cooler, or a new spot entirely? And so on and so forth......
With an aircraft engine, the most important thing is reliability. If a car engine fails, it is inconvenient, an airplane and people die. A car company can spend many $Ms on this because they will sell millions of engines. The aircraft engine makers are lucky if they sell 200 new engines a year. Most of their money comes from overhaul and parts. To really get fuel efficiency they need to go to liquid cooling. But why? Less than 2000 planes a year are built.
Carbizindio: You are right about the technology lag in the aviation industry.
This engine should have been available years ago,but you have a captive audience and massive prices to maintain any aviation engine as compared to any common fuel injected automotive engine today which goes for about $2,000.00
You are way off on the price though.The IE2 will be selling for well over $100,000 for the 350 horse version..Where do they get these prices from????
It blows my mind that the government would give these idiots so much money to design an engine that has less technology then a $500 motor in a 10 year old car. I'm guessing that this greedy corporation will end up selling this already out dated engine for $50,000+. I will never buy a plane with a Lycoming engine.
@kooldude0788 I would trust 6 electronic injectors over a carb any day. How often does a mechanical mag fail vs electronic ignition? An efficient engine is a safe engine. But hey that's just one mans opinion I'm no engineer "if it ain't broke don't fix it", isn't always right.
Only 9k views and added over a year ago, whats wrong here? And seriously why has it taken so long for an aircraft engine to become smart. Chrysler had crude "electronic fuel injection" in the late 50's!
Listen to this guy he is proud of having got money from the state. People don't have any shame in their life, they let them be bribed by their own money.
@MarkSDCA Take a look at ULPower's engines. Lighter than Rotax and natively fuel-injected as well as FADEC-controlled. I think they're MUCH better than Rotax.
cw8jwh 1 month ago
@MetaView7 If you look around you'll find some pretty good contenders. DeltaHawk for one. Don't forget that 100VLL and Swift fuel and nearing approval, if not achieving it already.
cw8jwh 1 month ago
@ChgoSTrider Are you an aircraft mechanic, or aeronautical engineer? How much heavier is a liquid-cooled engine versus one that isn't, given the same performance characteristics? How much better does a non-liquid cooled engine perform, over a liquid-cooled engine, without the liquid cooling operating? And where will the radiator go, in the same spot as the oil ( or even hydraulic ) cooler, or a new spot entirely? And so on and so forth......
cw8jwh 1 month ago
With an aircraft engine, the most important thing is reliability. If a car engine fails, it is inconvenient, an airplane and people die. A car company can spend many $Ms on this because they will sell millions of engines. The aircraft engine makers are lucky if they sell 200 new engines a year. Most of their money comes from overhaul and parts. To really get fuel efficiency they need to go to liquid cooling. But why? Less than 2000 planes a year are built.
ChgoSTrider 8 months ago
Carbizindio: You are right about the technology lag in the aviation industry.
This engine should have been available years ago,but you have a captive audience and massive prices to maintain any aviation engine as compared to any common fuel injected automotive engine today which goes for about $2,000.00
You are way off on the price though.The IE2 will be selling for well over $100,000 for the 350 horse version..Where do they get these prices from????
Tony7777M 11 months ago
It blows my mind that the government would give these idiots so much money to design an engine that has less technology then a $500 motor in a 10 year old car. I'm guessing that this greedy corporation will end up selling this already out dated engine for $50,000+. I will never buy a plane with a Lycoming engine.
CarBizIndio 11 months ago
@kooldude0788 I would trust 6 electronic injectors over a carb any day. How often does a mechanical mag fail vs electronic ignition? An efficient engine is a safe engine. But hey that's just one mans opinion I'm no engineer "if it ain't broke don't fix it", isn't always right.
rossor6ridr 1 year ago
@rossor6ridr - its all about reliability. The more simple and basic it is the less things to go wrong. I'd rather have a simple engine in the air..
kooldude0788 1 year ago
Only 9k views and added over a year ago, whats wrong here? And seriously why has it taken so long for an aircraft engine to become smart. Chrysler had crude "electronic fuel injection" in the late 50's!
rossor6ridr 1 year ago
Listen to this guy he is proud of having got money from the state. People don't have any shame in their life, they let them be bribed by their own money.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago