Self Defense Against Unlawful Arrest

As corrupt as the law is these days, from the drug dealing cops to the bribe taking judges and the pedophile politicians, you should well expect to be prosecuted for acting upon your right to self defense. SO! I figured I should express my understanding of the present system, that you will most surely suffer for acting against the wholly corrupt system by so extreme a measure as defending yourself from unlawful arrest. Personally I would, and have many times, submitted to unlawful arrest, especially when my resisting unlawful arrest reached a point where I would have to assault the criminal officers to regain my freedom. So, personally, that's what I would recommend, EXCEPT in a situation that was so extreme that my life was in immediate jeopardy OR I had observed massive illegal arrest that shared the nature of the war on Iraq or Nazi Germany's Jew round up or Stalin's brutal detention policies. So, basically, while there exists a community to plea to regarding the nature of your illegal detention, that seems to me the best solution when being detained by criminals, is to plea to the community at large. As soon as you win your freedom, petition the community, enlighten them to the brutal and rights disregarding nature of the "po lice". While in jail, demand your rights to communication with your family and lawyer. Fire as many corrupt public pretenders (public defender) as the state assigns you. Hamper your case by requesting investigation of what evidence you know exonerates you. Spend your time in jail making yourself physically and mentally strong, chat with everyone on your cell block who is at all reasonable. Exercise more than they let you goto the gym by pushups and handstands and squats. If you get close with someone, perhaps your cell mate, you might enhance your workouts by their applying additional pressure to your back on pushups or bottom of your feet on hand stands or shoulders during squats... Strengthen yourself, body and mind and surely the state won't want you in jail promoting strength and intelligence and unity and thus will more quickly expedite your release. Until everybody is willing to fight the state as hard as you, which will at first involve starving the state of tax payments, then you will be simply beating your head off a stone wall to fight the state. So, reduce your tax contribution to bare minimal, avoid taxes totally if possible, meaning check EXEMPT on the w2 you fill out when you get a job, and wait for your countrymen to sack up and decide to fight the good fight against tyranny.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• self
• defense
• unlawful
• arrest

[jlsperling1]

So, a pair of lying police officers can claim that what is legitimate self defense is really "resisting arrest", state so in their printed report and perjure themselves in court (where they will in all likelihood appear in full dress uniform). That way it would be two "law enforcement personnel" versus one "offender". Thank God that things are beginning to change.

[danielvincentkelley]

@jlsperling1

Best thing people can do to help themselves in court is not trust any lawyers. Demand jury trial. Question the officers extensively which is something most lawyers will interfere with, which is why mostly people are better to represent themselves. Lawyers on both sides are all criminally employed strident believers in Machiavelli's philosophy of dominance without regard for morality. People must testify on their own behalf. and tell the jury the reality of the situation.

[danielvincentkelley]

@jlsperl

Lawyers tell you the opposite of what's good for innocent defendants. They're guilty a-holes. They're not trying to help innocent people. The whole system is trying to tear everybody down. Lawyers try to get rich off of tearing people down. Almost all Lawyers tell people to not testify in their own defense. Lawyers are screwballs. Nothing's changing. This is a revolution. The word means to go around again. Just another cycle of reaction to the dominants attempts to murder everybody.

[ne014x]

These are not suppreme court cases they only apply in the states that they were in, no US wide

[danielvincentkelley]

@ne014x Interesting point. Do you know has the supreme court decided a false arrest case? It wouldn't surprise me if those bunch of corrupt bureaucrats have never heard such a case, considering they preside over a "justice" system that imprisons nearly a million Americans yearly for victimless crimes. I'm pretty sure they couldn't care less what the law is. Jury trial is US law. Jury nullification is US law. Right to self defense is ancient. Government corruption is similarly ancient.

[danielvincentkelley]

@ne014x Interesting point. Do you know has the supreme court decided a false arrest case? It wouldn't surprise me if those bunch of corrupt bureaucrats have never heard such a case, considering they preside over a "justice" system that imprisons nearly a million Americans yearly for victimless crimes. I'm pretty sure they couldn't care less what the law is. Jury trial is US law. Jury nullification is US law. Right to self defense is ancient. Government corruption is similarly ancient.

[CaneFu]

@danielvincentkelley

A man who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client.

[jlsperling1]

Up until the last few years, a case between an detainee and a police officer usually went against the detainee. That is because of the proliferation of personal and portable video and voice recorders. Up until lately, the matter was a case of "he said, she said", and the legal process unfortunately shows great deference to anybody wearing a uniform. So, a pair of lying police officers can claim that what is legitimate self defense is really "resisting arrest", report it and perjure themselves.

[ne014x]

@danielvincentkelley Most of that is covered under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) - At least the pre-arrest parts of it. The Terry case was the most important Supreme court hearing in regards to the right of a person when confronted by the police. Most of what happens when someone is wrongfully convicted is civil action. I think most people who are wrongly arrested even when the case is dropped are too scared to take it further, and besides one a case is dropped what is there to appeal to.

[hifatpeople]

OMFG, i search the house for headphones before pushing play to find this. At least it wasn't that techno song