Does archaeology confirm or contradick the Bible?

Does archaeology confirm or contradick the Bible?Listen and make up your mind.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• The
• Bible

[nicoforjesus]

I hope you all enjoy the vid.You tubers

[gregrutz]

Archaeology show that by 6000 BC Egyptians in the SW corner of Egypt were herding cattle and constructing large buildings. Subsistence in organized and permanent settlements in predynastic Egypt by the middle of the 6th millennium BC centered predominantly on cereal and animal agriculture. Metal objects replaced prior ones of stone. Tanning of animal skins, pottery and weaving are common. There are indications of seasonal occupation of the Al Fayyum in the 6th millennium BC. What global flood?

[stephjh2006]

@LotusGreenX wasit not a local flood?

[rancantrell]

Paul Maier is one smart man.

[gregrutz]

Geology proves the bible wrong. The earth is old and there was no flood.

[jeanniemarie76]

Contradick? lol

[BillKiernan]

"contradick"

[geezzerboy]

What a bunch of nonsense.

[LotusGreenX]

"They wanted o see if the so called rainbow appeared after the great flood,they used this powerful computer program."

Scientists consider the flood story to be bunk not just because there is no evidence for it, but if it did occur there would be many facts that contradict science and common sense. How did Noah have every kind of animal come in the boat and leave the boat onto every continent without dying is an amazingly fictisious accomplishment right there.

[LotusGreenX]

"Isaiah 53:5"

Fair enough it sounds a lot like Jesus, of course translations can help. But what about the part where it talks about the suffering servants descendants and every other passage of Isaiah uses the suffering servant to refer to Israel?

Besides that we already know the gospel authors were quick to try to make their leader coerrelate to Old testament "prophecies." The famous Isaiah 7:14 about Jesus virgin birth is taken out of context and doesn't even have to mean virgin either