www.anaut.eu
Many ..... times I ask myself in the long hours of work in the studio if my work is useful for others? The answer is not for me to answer, but for others. Is it only for satisfying one's *ego*, I ask myself.....?
Also I question the state-of-the-art at the beginning of the 21st century.....
Regarding the first question, I am not the one that decides the answer, it is others who decide, is Art useful or not.
Regarding the second question I have the feeling that art in its evolution, has almost lost all content relating to its original purpose, the reason for which art was created in the first place, if it was created for something and by somebody in particular?
To speak of information or beauty in art for many today sounds *decadent* or *archaic*...., their remains almost nothing of the art of yesterday in creativity today, possibly only the name, ART.
In this second reflection, two strong tendencies are unified inside me:- the first, the impossible illusion to return to the *renaissance* or to the *baroque*, and the second, to assume the responsibility of the *contemporary* in me, with the understanding, sad or not, that I probably form part of *cynisism* that is breathed today in the art.
The conclusions for me for this 2008 have been fantastic, with exhibitions in London, Ireland, France and returning in August to exhibit in England, besides three group shows in France.
I am afraid the motivation therefore for these writings and analysis is not so much for you, but for myself, to self-criticise, the remains of those *mesianic* thoughts which made me used to think I would change the world, in those days of being a student in Paris.
Project:- *Shitwhy shut up....??*
The project *Shit.....why shut up* as you will verify, is not intended to prove the good or bad education of individuals.......who by the way are obliged to be well educated? which probably one can also analyse?? If you have time, participate in this debate and also invite others to participate.
Thanks Felix Anaut
www.anaut.eu
*Shit.....why shut up*
Contrary as to what it may seem *Shitwhy shut up* is a serious attempt, one of many, to analyse what there is behind....the content ofthe word ART if one gets rid of the adjectives that define *ART*, for example through history: Romanesque, Gothic, Renaissance right up to the Contemporary and also if one suppresses the *Isms* that have defined the styles in art.
What remains in *ART* that is common to all the periods and styles ......??
Is *ART* information?
Is *ART* beauty ...........?
Is it materials, technique, content, imagination?
Is it all this or none of this, or yes.....this....or all that....?.....Is everything valid in *ART*, what is not valid.....?
Your opinion is obviously important, for that reason we are trying to make contact and to know your opinion.
Go to http://uk.youtube.com/user/anaut... click on *Mierda...porque callarse*
During many years, after 1960, in particular in the New York School, figurative art had been defined as archaic, and those artists who dared themselves to try and exhibit in one of those very sophisticated galleries was often told *no* like an answer (if lucky) and in many cases without any answer. Our analysis started at this point. Possibly you can give your opinion, also possibly you have the power to spread this note to others to ave their opinion up to you
Thanks Felix Anaut
n.b. Believe me, art does not divide ..........there is only one human race....and one planet Earth the rest is demagoguery.... www.anaut.eu
http://www.anaut.eu
http://www.youtube.com/anaut
http://fineartamerica.com/profiles/felix-anaut.html
email info@anaut.eu
http://uk.youtube.com/user/anaut
Loading...
I LOVE YOUR WORK.
bbuteo 2 years ago