WHY DID RON PAUL LOSE THE PRIMARY ELECTIONS ?

I AM A NON-AMERICAN WHO DID NOT UNDERSTAND WHY RON PAUL LOST THE PRIMARY ELECTIONS! please feel free to explain your opinion.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• ronpaul
• ron
• paul
• primary
• elections
• john
• macain
• obama
• Bush
• hillary
• clinton
• iraq
• congress
• senate
• america
• american
• us
• usa

[truindep]

dr.paul didn't "win" for a number of reasons. 1. he's too smart 2. he's too honest 3. he has integrity 4. he's consistent 5. he makes his decisions based on logic&the constitution 6. msm blackout 7. voter fraud...&on&on.

[mousepd]

Here in the Louisiana Republican Presidential Primary, when it became apparent that Ron Paul was going to gather more Delegates and win the La. Primary, the GOP extended deadlines, disqualified Delegates and basically changed the rules. They did this in the Nevada Primary as well. And as with recent Christie Odonnell win, Karl Rove and the elite GOP are at it again. Trying to control our so called " free elections". But this time, thanks to the massive Tea Party support, the Elites are losing c

[thebigconsultant]

Easy. Voting machines don't allow Freedom (tm)

[The10man1]

@mousepd Good!!

[HSUniversal]

Because of the very basis of the primary elections. Our electoral colleges work in such different ways than the simple "choose your vote". He lost because a person like him is what the world needs to get to such a good vibration, through truth and justice, through love and harmony but that is not part of the plan. His presidency is not part of the plan. It's like seeing a rose in the middle of the desert. He is the rose, but the desert won't allow it.

[Animeabe]

Ron Paul lost because Americans are stupid. We base our descesions off of what the TV tells us. We also have a two party system that works like a team sport. Once people pick a team its hard for them to switch because they beleive that its the party they are voting for instead of the person. Basically most Americans are ill-informed or un-motivated to look for answers. Also our major media works for their owners intrests instead of delivering unbaised news. Its controlled.. just like us.

[ArcanineKing]

Oh, and by the way, Osama did not attack us.

It was all a conspiracy. Yes, a conspiracy, of corrupt corporate greedy fuckers who paid the government to do an act of terrorism with military precision.

We're not that stupid. The pentagon crash never occured, it was a bomb that set it off, and the wreckage of the plane was too damn small to be any kind of jet airliner, and the pentagon was left intact, leaving the plane to be evaporized... are you serious?

Planes do not dissapear out of thin air!

[ArcanineKing]

Uh... ever realize those were not 'talibans' but freedom fighters? After your military put Hussein out of power, there was hell breaking loose all over. It was on the news, and some of the "insurgents" as you call them, were in fact, iraqi civilians. I do not know where you get "IDing" hostiles from civilians. To you, civilians are unarmed targets, and hostiles are armed targets.

Better question, how were you able to ID foreign people who are in hiding all the time? That just makes no sense.

[nilo723]

Osama bin laden is just a CIA pawn..The govt wanted get stuck in iraq to secure its oil reserves..look at the amount spent on military bases there..now the iraqi oil would remain privatised for a long long time..

[barccy]

what?

[barccy]

I still don't buy damatt08's explanation of suicide bombing being motivated by selfishness, terrorism not having a primarily socio-political goal, and end justifies means philosophy.