Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Building Demolition - Top Down

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
11,892
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 4, 2009

This is a building demolition. It was pulled down by bulldozers.

Please Subscribe, Rate, And Comment!

Have other videos of collapsing buildings? Leave them as a video response or submit them to HouseHoldDisasters@live.com!

Links:

TWITTER: http://www.twitter.com/HHDisasters

MORE LINKS WILL BE HERE SOON!!!

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • great job, justl like 911

  • These buildings are not constructed like the WTC, with a central spine and outer load bearing walls. And if one is doing a demo it matters not where you start as long as you remove the mass below so things "can progress". There are essentially no concrete and no office contents remaining. All of it was pulverized in mid air. It was almost impossible to find even one filing cabinet at the WTC. Thats how much is Missing at the WTC. Including some 1000 people pulverized as well. 220 acres gone

see all

All Comments (69)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You can see how the building meets resistance when it falls on top of the other half, and the continues to fall down at the reduced speed. It's NOT free fall speed. You can't grind up a building and have it collapse at free fall speed. The energy output isn't possible, the free fall speed is the entirety of the energy that is being generated, so it slowing down as a result of the resistance it meets with the floors below is expected and represented in this video, which doesn't happen on 9/11

  • @ctcole77Gosh it is so easy to see. Those buildings were blow to dust by explosives lol this is so sad it is almost funny. Except for the fact 3000 people were killed and forget that they deserve the truth and justice. Seems only fair to investigate every aspect of 911 and if a real investigation takes place, get those behind it unless it was really the caveman in sandals that did it. Not!

  • @giptonsilly Dokładnie ;] Wystarczy cysterna z benzyną, nie wiem po co tyle dni planują wyburzenie takiego budynku ;]

  • @ctcole77 If fire can bring down a steel framed skyscraper why don't they just set fire to buildings and save thousands of dollars on explosives ? It worked well on 9/11 knocking down two 110 story buildings in 9.2 seconds in to a neat little pile and a few hours later building 7 a 47 story skyscraper in 6.2 seconds and not even hit by a plane. Answers on a post card to, I'm a dumb fuck and I believe everything my government tell me, The white house USA

  • 3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    Why did Dr. Steven Jones circumvent the peer review process by not showing his nanothermite paper to the chief editor and printing it without her approval?

    How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?

    If the WTC was destroyed via demolition, how did the charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the buildings?

  • @truthspeaks01 Yeah. I've been doing a lot of research.

  • THE MUSIC...IT BURNS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @NothingAtAllXD yeah it's too hard to debate someone when they have facts... all you can do is just repeat main stream media talking points or when those fail throw in an ad-hominem(your not american). good job smacking him with facts though. :)

  • @amrcnidiot69 why? because we question the bs excuse that the main stream media and govt tried to force feed us?

  • @JohHughes94 I did investigate, go look it up on Google Images, but of course those Ground Zero images were planted by Truthers. I've seen the PBS Documentary, you need to do some research.

  • @JohHughes94 Tell that to the gov't. They start unconstitutional wars in Libya. Warrantless wiretapping, your Appeals to Tradition that don't even exist prove nothing.

  • @JohHughes94 Debate against all of the contentions of a CD, oh wait, that's too hard. I did, there was a documentary on PBS in 1996 that I can't recall right now that talked about it's concrete-core, rebarb was found all throughout the debris and the core was found standing at ground zero, just google-images it! Concrete just makes the official explanation even more implausible.

  • @NothingAtAllXD Dude, take a few hours to watch videos on how the world trade center was constructed, maybe then you will understand, ive argued my point, and you have argued yours, i don't see any headway on either side so im just going to end the conversation.

  • @JohHughes94 Also, you seriously need to watch this: /watch?v=VZ1E2NPl-s8 ++Just shows exactly what happened to the WTCs, concept has been done before. Also take a look at this good analysis: /watch?v=hSApOavkHg8&feature=c­hannel_video_title ++Only plausible mechanism that can contribute to what we saw that day is a combination of pre-planted incendiaries and conventional explosives pulled off by an elite demo. team in the military. Just stop for a second and think...

  • @JohHughes94 Actually very unlikely. Look up Operation Northwoods, Op Ajax, Op Gladio, Bay of Tonkin False Flag, USS Liberty False Flag...Det cords weren't seen because many of the explosives were individually timed and from other incendiaries would melt everything including demolition cord easily. Manhattan Project successfully compartmentalized 100,000 people to work on Nuke Research with stunning results. FDNY men heard "detonators" going off at collapse...

  • @NothingAtAllXD Also /watch?v=UpolV5bBIKk&feature=r­elated this shows you the explosives clearly wrapped around the supporting columns. Even if the government acted as a whole (highly unlikely) and committed this crime, unlimited resources doesn't explain why no one ever saw detention cord, or any kind of explosives. also the firemen who claim they heard explosions weren't wrong, its been proven that several cars including a diesel tanker truck exploded in the garage.

  • @NothingAtAllXD Also your statement is false, the world trade center didn't have a concrete core, learn some facts and investigate before jumping to conclusions

  • @NothingAtAllXD WOW you don't understand the concept of checks and balances do you?

  • @IExposeMormonism The North Tower has a concrete core that was most likely demolished with the use of an elaborate amount of C4 or some other variant of plastic explosives. Tons of rebarb was found in the debris...even 2 pictures conform a small portion standing of the concrete core covered with rebarb.

  • @Impess99 The Holocaust was 70 years ago, tell the judicial system to stop doing trials for the murder of foreigners. This murdered 3,000 innocent americans on our soil

  • @JohHughes94 Just think about it, the gov't has unlimited resources and think tanks to do this...

  • @JohHughes94 It doesn't make sense. Let's say the Jet Fuel fires were strong enough to melt the steel or weaken it which is impossible, the building would topple OVER into the path of least resistance like pulling out a few columns from a jenga tower. The North Tower's Collapse started to do that and totally debunked the pile driver theory that NIST painted but than swayed back and was pulverized into dust from superheated explosions going off in the center.

  • @JohHughes94 Actually, no, if you watched the collapse. Several stories above the collapse zone were severed and THEN the building fell through the collapse zone with no distinction from the alleged weakened columns from 50,000 Degrees Burning Jet Fuel and fully, intact and operating structural steel. Violates Newton's 3rd Law and shows no sign of deceleration like the Verinage Demol. Technique which has the columns knocked out more than halfway and the columns already weakened all throughout...

  • @JohHughes94 Just think about the Manhattan Project, insane compartmentalization going on there! Now apply that to the Twin Towers and think about it. The building could've been rigged while it was being built or during a phase of its construction, which is unlikely but still possible. The US Gov't is the elite Hegemonic power dominating the world, if they can create WMDs that can level cities in seconds, what's wrong with rigging the WTCs with a semi-unconventional demolition method?

  • @JohHughes94 Anyone who had access to the Elevators shafts had full access to the interior of the columns and the concrete core of the North Tower, which was exploded with large amounts of plastic explosives which explains the spire that we saw which was elevator columns with rebarb sticking out. The South Tower was just columns and could easily be rigged and demolished as we saw! If the gov't was involved, don't you think they would have the resources, time and planning?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more