Why Christians have it wrong (14 of 50)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,248
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 31, 2008

Continuing Leibniz's chief argument against dualism in favor of the omnipotence and beneficence of God. Dualism as the actual original sin and the lie of the Garden of Eden. The types of evil. Suffering as a state of mind rather than a metaphysical reality.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (malakhhatzadik)

  • God did indeed create good and evil. Everything was made by Him through Him and for Him. Jesus is the only Way,by no other name shall man be saved. I suggest you read the entire book of Isaiah, the references to Jesus{the messiah} are numerous and cannot be mistaken for anything other than God Almighty prophesying about His Son.I am praying for your understanding. The multiplication of words is often mistaken for knowledge and wisdom. May God bless you in Jesus Christ Name.Love, Glenna

  • Jesus = the Antichrist, Horus, Mithras, Apollo. How do you get around that, ye who claims to have read the Bible?

    Wisdom is justified in all her children. Luke 7:35

  • So, I seem to have trouble discerning "what you believe" from what you will use in attempt to "prove a point." You seem to claim that the god of the old testament is no more than a demiurge. You also seem to claim that Genesis' recounting of creation where god said "it is good" is evidence that creation is in fact good. Perhaps it is just difficult to keep a logical progression when you dance between different metaphysical disciplines...

  • I don't think that it's right for you to say that I seem to, for example, "the god of the old testament is no more than a demiurge," when I have gone so far and done so much to prove the exact opposite and refute the entire neo-Manichaean/ Luciferian paradigm which states as much. Obviously I am not this guy you are attacking. If you think there is a flaw in my argument, then attack the argument.

see all

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hello I'm currently finishing my esoteric inquiry into the NT. Here's one thing I've been wondering. When Jesus(yahshuah) says I believe in one of the gospels "Do not worship me, for I am a messenger of your Father in Heaven. And after my passing there shall come a helper to assist me." Who is this vague and mysterious helper Jesus speaks of? My guesses are A) Mary Magdalene B) St. Paul or C) Prophet Muhammad but the latter is a long shot however? Who do you think the helper is?

  • Love that quote: To those who question evil in the universe, let us be aware that the universe was not made for us alone, but it is made for us if we're wise, it will serve us if we choose to use its service

  • specific time, please

  • What chapeter from Leibniz are you reading where he speaks on dualism?

  • No, I'm not saying that. Entropy is not chaos. Entropy is nature. The law of nature is nature.

  • So, your saying that law of nature is chaos, correct?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more