Re: Egypt was not a Black civilization
Top Comments
All Comments (971)
-
@Boukephalos1 You are, as ignorant as all arabs and european ass holes. Once and for all Ancient Kemet was black. Arabs and europeans were savages. End of that argument.
-
@Boukephalos1 iGENEA and TUT why mention the Swedish study that even the owner of the Dienekes site mentioned as being nonsensical.
-
Your the ridiculous one! if all Tut's dna was Caucasian what happened to his parents and the rest of the Amarna dynasty. dnatribes is not Afrocentric data and your not getting it in terms of what a haplogroup signifies it is not the entire genotype profile of an individual just one very minute part!. Get it! So you are saying even this family of Tiyes was more Caucasian than modern Egyptians. lol! Use some common sense!
-
@KushaDwipa now you're getting ridiculous, not 3400 yrs ago.and ALL Tut's lineage were Caucasian iGENEA, said it has reconstructed the Y chromosome profile of the Ancient Egyptian king based on data shown on a documentary made for the Discovery Channel. This information would put Tutankhamun in a genetic profile group called Rb1b1a2, to which many Europeans, but less than one percent of Egyptians belong.. Stop reading afro-centric data. No one of scholarship does. We're finished.
-
@Boukephalos1 - Discovery Channel never ever said anything about Tut who died of the African sickle cell trait of being A CAUCASIAN. That is something you are fantasizing about but it never happened.. The Amarna pharaohs autosomal dna was PREDOMINANTLY sub-Saharan African. See dnatribes labs study. All anyone has to google it! This is the earth we are living on not in another one of your Spartacus video game fantasies.
-
@KushaDwipa don't waste your time trying to convince me take it up with the Discovery CHANNEL AND THE iGENEA. Prove them Wrong. You know as well as I they had to be very sure of what they were saying or else, called racist. You can't but should you succeed I will believe you. His DNA was identified by his maternal bloodline which cares the DNA factor determining race. He had European Caucasian DNA there was NO MENTION or Finding of sub-Saharan DNA the TUT bloodline.
-
@Boukephalos1 - OMG snap out of it. Come out of ur dream state! the paternal haplogroup has very little to say about ones origins silly. It means if anything at the most Tut had a male ancestor on his fathers fathers fathers line that was European way back when. Please take a basic anthropology course. i thank u for your attention to this matter. His autosomnal dna shows he was more sub-Saharan African than many present day Horn of Africans.lol!
-
@Boukephalos1 since I am black woman and my paternal haplogroup is European do i become as white as Tut. Just wondering?
@Fuquan2212 Your wrong, muslims defaced it. Now this will really upset you. ..Half of European men share King Tut's DNA Up to 70 percent of British men and half of all Western European men are related to the Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun, geneticists in Switzerland said. Scientists at Zurich-based DNA genealogy centre, iGENEA, reconstructed the DNA profile of the boy Pharaoh, who ascended the throne at the age of nine, his father Akhenaten and grandfather Amenhotep III. Egyptians weren't black.
Boukephalos1 7 months ago 8
@Fuquan2212 The results showed that King Tut belonged to a genetic profile group, known as haplogroup R1b1a2, to which more than 50 percent of all men in Western Europe belong, indicating that they share a common ancestor.
Among modern-day Egyptians this haplogroup contingent is below 1 percent, according to iGENEA
Now don't you wish you had left me along.
Boukephalos1 7 months ago 7