@luanneism IN MY UPLOADS RIGHT NOW - I INVITE ANYONE AND EVERYONE TO COME SEE IT - IT IS REAL AND SHE REALLY SAID IT, BUT THEN QUICKLY TRIED TO BACKTRACK, BECAUSE SHE KNEW FULL WELL THE RELATIONSHIP WAS FAKE AND MICHAEL NEVER WENT ANYWHERE NEAR HER SEXUALLY! HOW CAN YOU POSSIBLY BELIEVE TARABORELLI OR ANY OF THESE COMMENTATORS WHEN THE PROTAGONISTS THEMSELVES OPENLY NEGATE WHAT HAS BEEN CLAIMED? MICHAEL JACKSON WAS NOT IN THE SLIGHTEST BIT INTERESTED IN THIS DOG AND SHE KNEW IT!!
@luanneism P.S. YOU QUOTE PEOPLE SUCH AS RANDY TARABORELLI? HOW INTERESTING. TARABORELLI IS THE ONE WHO SAID IN HIS BOOK "MAGIC AND MADNESS" THAT THERE WAS A "STRONG SEXUAL CHEMISTRY" BETWEEN MICHAEL AND LISA MARIE PRESLEY AND IT WAS THE "FIRST TIME MICHAEL HAD FELT SO STRONGLY ABOUT ANOTHER PERSON", YET LMP TOTALLY BLOWS THAT OUT OF THE WATER HERSELF IN AN INTERVIEW SHE DID WITH HOWARD STERN IN 2003 IN WHICH SHE OUTRIGHT STATED THAT MICHAEL DID "NOT SEXUALLY SATISFY HER"! THIS INTERVIEW IS
@luanneism LIKE I SAY, SUPERTROLL, THE HARD FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES ABOVE AND BEYOND ANYTHING ELSE I MIGHT SAY ON YT, SO IF YOU CAN SHOW ME EVIDENCE THAT MICHAEL AND LMP WERE "DATING AFTER THE DIVORCE" .. REAL EVIDENCE, NOT PHOTOSHOP, OR HARD EVIDENCE OF ANY OF THE OTHER LUDICROUS, MYTHICAL MUSINGS THAT HAVE BEEN CLAIMED SINCE AND EVEN BEFORE MICHAEL'S DEATH, THEN YOU JUST GO RIGHT AHEAD AND FUCKING SHOW IT TO ME AND WE WILL TAKE IT FROM THERE!!
@luanneism DAUGHTER .. WHAT A LAUGH! NEVER MIND THE FACT THAT MICHAEL THEN MADE A DELIBERATE AND CONTRIVED COMPARISON WITH OTIS BLACKWELL'S "DAUGHTER" IN ORDER TO NEGATE LMP'S SO CALLED "ROCK ROYALTY" AS THE "PRINCESS" OF ROCK AND ROLL! IF ANYONE HATED THE PRESLEYS IT WAS MICHAEL, THEY TOTALLY HIJACKED AND FUCKED OVER HIS IMAGE IN THE 1990's AND ARE TRYING TO DO SO AGAIN AFTER HIS DEATH. THE ENTIRE THING IS POLITICAL AND LMP WAS NOTHING BUT A VEHICLE TO TRY AND PUT MICHAEL IN BONDAGE TO ELVIS!
@luanneism IT WAS HER REQUEST AND FOR SOME WEIRD REASON THEY ALLOWED IT, IT WASN'T THE JACKSON'S CONCEPTION AND IT MOST CERTAINLY HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH MICHAEL JACKSON! SHE IS JUST A PUSHY LITTLE TROLLOP WITH A LOT OF POWER IN THE AMERICAN MUSIC INDUSTRY AND MAINSTREAM MEDIA BY WAY OF HER BIRTH, AND THE JACKSONS ARE GLUTTONS FOR PR. LIKE I SAY THEY - ALL OF THEM EXCEPT FOR KATHERINE JACKSON - WERE LEFT OUT OF THE WILL. FURTHERMORE, THE ANECDOTAL MUSINGS OF INCIDENTALS SUCH AS DONALD TRUMP COULD
@luanneism YOU REALLY DO MAKE ME LAUGH, KNOWING HOW RACIST YOU TRULY ARE BASED ON YOUR OTHER ACCOUNTS AND HERE YOU ARE, SUPPOSEDLY STICKING UP FOR THE "JACKSON FAMILY", LOLOL WHAT A JOKE! IT WAS NOT THE JACKSON'S IDEA TO PUT SUNFLOWERS AROUND MICHAEL'S TOMB, IT WAS PRESLEYS IDEA - SHE PUSHED HER WAY IN JUST LIKE SHE DID AFTER THE "DIVORCE", AND THEY FOR SOME WEIRD REASON ALLOWED HER TO DO IT. BUT IT WAS HER IDEA ON A WHIM - EVEN RANDY JACKSON SAYS SO IN AN INTERVIEW YOU CAN STILL SEE ON YT.
@luanneism LIKE I SAY, YOU USE IT BECAUSE YOU KNOW IT IS CONTENTIOUS AND IS GUARANTEED TO CAUSE EMOTIONAL PAIN TO MANY OF THE FANS. BECAUSE IT IS WICKED AND REPRESENTS EVIL, EVEN IF UNKNOWINGLY BY THE PROTAGONISTS. ALL YOU ARE HERE FOR IS TO HURT AND UPSET AS MANY OF MICHAEL'S FANS AS YOU POSSIBLY CAN. YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT HIS MUSIC, HIS DANCING, OR HIS ARTISTRY IN ANY WAY, ALL YOU HAVE DONE IS MEMORISE FACTS AND FIGURES BECAUSE YOU ARE A PROFESSIONAL, FULL-TIME INTERNET TROLL.
@luanneism OKAY? SO IF AS YOUR CURRENT "PERSONA" YOU DO NOT LIKE THAT THEN YOU CAN "EAT IT" AND YOU CAN STEW ON IT, BECAUSE MICHAEL HAD NO SAY IN IT AT ALL, IT QUITE LITERALLY HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH HIM! YOU CAN NOT USE IT AS "EVIDENCE" OF ANYTHING BECAUSE IT WAS A POLITICAL STUNT COMPLETELY DEVOID OF HIS INPUT. IF THE SUNFLOWERS SYMBOLISM WAS SO IRRELEVANT THEN WHY DO YOU USE IT AS YOUR AVATAR?
@luanneism LISTEN YOU CREEPY LITTLE ENTITY FROM HELL, WHAT I SAY GOES FAR BEYOND OPINION, I KNOW JUST EXACTLY WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT .. AND IF CITING LEGAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS MICHAEL JACKSON'S WILL IS NOT ENOUGH FOR SOME PEOPLE THEN THAT IS TOO BAD! A LOT OF WHAT I KNOW I CAN NOT SPIT OUT ONLINE BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO GET SUED. NEEDLESS TO SAY, THE HARD EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT IF MICHAEL JACKSON HAD POSSESSED ANY PROFOUND, SUSTAINED FEELING FOR LMP IT WOULD HAVE CROPPED UP IN HIS WILL ..
lisa sucks
Mjlovings10 1 month ago
@luanneism IN MY UPLOADS RIGHT NOW - I INVITE ANYONE AND EVERYONE TO COME SEE IT - IT IS REAL AND SHE REALLY SAID IT, BUT THEN QUICKLY TRIED TO BACKTRACK, BECAUSE SHE KNEW FULL WELL THE RELATIONSHIP WAS FAKE AND MICHAEL NEVER WENT ANYWHERE NEAR HER SEXUALLY! HOW CAN YOU POSSIBLY BELIEVE TARABORELLI OR ANY OF THESE COMMENTATORS WHEN THE PROTAGONISTS THEMSELVES OPENLY NEGATE WHAT HAS BEEN CLAIMED? MICHAEL JACKSON WAS NOT IN THE SLIGHTEST BIT INTERESTED IN THIS DOG AND SHE KNEW IT!!
BDSaysHi 2 months ago
@luanneism P.S. YOU QUOTE PEOPLE SUCH AS RANDY TARABORELLI? HOW INTERESTING. TARABORELLI IS THE ONE WHO SAID IN HIS BOOK "MAGIC AND MADNESS" THAT THERE WAS A "STRONG SEXUAL CHEMISTRY" BETWEEN MICHAEL AND LISA MARIE PRESLEY AND IT WAS THE "FIRST TIME MICHAEL HAD FELT SO STRONGLY ABOUT ANOTHER PERSON", YET LMP TOTALLY BLOWS THAT OUT OF THE WATER HERSELF IN AN INTERVIEW SHE DID WITH HOWARD STERN IN 2003 IN WHICH SHE OUTRIGHT STATED THAT MICHAEL DID "NOT SEXUALLY SATISFY HER"! THIS INTERVIEW IS
BDSaysHi 2 months ago
@luanneism LIKE I SAY, SUPERTROLL, THE HARD FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES ABOVE AND BEYOND ANYTHING ELSE I MIGHT SAY ON YT, SO IF YOU CAN SHOW ME EVIDENCE THAT MICHAEL AND LMP WERE "DATING AFTER THE DIVORCE" .. REAL EVIDENCE, NOT PHOTOSHOP, OR HARD EVIDENCE OF ANY OF THE OTHER LUDICROUS, MYTHICAL MUSINGS THAT HAVE BEEN CLAIMED SINCE AND EVEN BEFORE MICHAEL'S DEATH, THEN YOU JUST GO RIGHT AHEAD AND FUCKING SHOW IT TO ME AND WE WILL TAKE IT FROM THERE!!
BDSaysHi 2 months ago
@luanneism DAUGHTER .. WHAT A LAUGH! NEVER MIND THE FACT THAT MICHAEL THEN MADE A DELIBERATE AND CONTRIVED COMPARISON WITH OTIS BLACKWELL'S "DAUGHTER" IN ORDER TO NEGATE LMP'S SO CALLED "ROCK ROYALTY" AS THE "PRINCESS" OF ROCK AND ROLL! IF ANYONE HATED THE PRESLEYS IT WAS MICHAEL, THEY TOTALLY HIJACKED AND FUCKED OVER HIS IMAGE IN THE 1990's AND ARE TRYING TO DO SO AGAIN AFTER HIS DEATH. THE ENTIRE THING IS POLITICAL AND LMP WAS NOTHING BUT A VEHICLE TO TRY AND PUT MICHAEL IN BONDAGE TO ELVIS!
BDSaysHi 2 months ago
@luanneism IT WAS HER REQUEST AND FOR SOME WEIRD REASON THEY ALLOWED IT, IT WASN'T THE JACKSON'S CONCEPTION AND IT MOST CERTAINLY HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH MICHAEL JACKSON! SHE IS JUST A PUSHY LITTLE TROLLOP WITH A LOT OF POWER IN THE AMERICAN MUSIC INDUSTRY AND MAINSTREAM MEDIA BY WAY OF HER BIRTH, AND THE JACKSONS ARE GLUTTONS FOR PR. LIKE I SAY THEY - ALL OF THEM EXCEPT FOR KATHERINE JACKSON - WERE LEFT OUT OF THE WILL. FURTHERMORE, THE ANECDOTAL MUSINGS OF INCIDENTALS SUCH AS DONALD TRUMP COULD
BDSaysHi 2 months ago
@luanneism YOU REALLY DO MAKE ME LAUGH, KNOWING HOW RACIST YOU TRULY ARE BASED ON YOUR OTHER ACCOUNTS AND HERE YOU ARE, SUPPOSEDLY STICKING UP FOR THE "JACKSON FAMILY", LOLOL WHAT A JOKE! IT WAS NOT THE JACKSON'S IDEA TO PUT SUNFLOWERS AROUND MICHAEL'S TOMB, IT WAS PRESLEYS IDEA - SHE PUSHED HER WAY IN JUST LIKE SHE DID AFTER THE "DIVORCE", AND THEY FOR SOME WEIRD REASON ALLOWED HER TO DO IT. BUT IT WAS HER IDEA ON A WHIM - EVEN RANDY JACKSON SAYS SO IN AN INTERVIEW YOU CAN STILL SEE ON YT.
BDSaysHi 2 months ago
@luanneism LIKE I SAY, YOU USE IT BECAUSE YOU KNOW IT IS CONTENTIOUS AND IS GUARANTEED TO CAUSE EMOTIONAL PAIN TO MANY OF THE FANS. BECAUSE IT IS WICKED AND REPRESENTS EVIL, EVEN IF UNKNOWINGLY BY THE PROTAGONISTS. ALL YOU ARE HERE FOR IS TO HURT AND UPSET AS MANY OF MICHAEL'S FANS AS YOU POSSIBLY CAN. YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT HIS MUSIC, HIS DANCING, OR HIS ARTISTRY IN ANY WAY, ALL YOU HAVE DONE IS MEMORISE FACTS AND FIGURES BECAUSE YOU ARE A PROFESSIONAL, FULL-TIME INTERNET TROLL.
BDSaysHi 2 months ago
@luanneism OKAY? SO IF AS YOUR CURRENT "PERSONA" YOU DO NOT LIKE THAT THEN YOU CAN "EAT IT" AND YOU CAN STEW ON IT, BECAUSE MICHAEL HAD NO SAY IN IT AT ALL, IT QUITE LITERALLY HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH HIM! YOU CAN NOT USE IT AS "EVIDENCE" OF ANYTHING BECAUSE IT WAS A POLITICAL STUNT COMPLETELY DEVOID OF HIS INPUT. IF THE SUNFLOWERS SYMBOLISM WAS SO IRRELEVANT THEN WHY DO YOU USE IT AS YOUR AVATAR?
BDSaysHi 2 months ago
@luanneism LISTEN YOU CREEPY LITTLE ENTITY FROM HELL, WHAT I SAY GOES FAR BEYOND OPINION, I KNOW JUST EXACTLY WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT .. AND IF CITING LEGAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS MICHAEL JACKSON'S WILL IS NOT ENOUGH FOR SOME PEOPLE THEN THAT IS TOO BAD! A LOT OF WHAT I KNOW I CAN NOT SPIT OUT ONLINE BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO GET SUED. NEEDLESS TO SAY, THE HARD EVIDENCE SHOWS THAT IF MICHAEL JACKSON HAD POSSESSED ANY PROFOUND, SUSTAINED FEELING FOR LMP IT WOULD HAVE CROPPED UP IN HIS WILL ..
BDSaysHi 2 months ago