Ted Nugent: I Couldnt Vote For Sarah Palin

http://hapblog.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• ted
• nugent
• sarah
• palin
• anderson
• cooper
• john
• boehner
• cnn
• msnbc
• fox
• news
• glenn
• beck
• sean
• hannity
• barack
• obama
• williams

[jneil2007]

I couldn't vote for Palin either Ted. I can sure as hell vote for Ron Paul or Gary Johnson though.

[ChicaWolverina]

Well anyone ever for her shouldn't have citizenship, but I guess until I saw this I forgot what an ignorant redneck pos Uncle Ted is.

[GrizzledGeek1980]

@ChicaWolverina: Not all rednecks are ignorant. There are way more than a few thousand ignorant non-rednecks in this country, what about them? The majority of who you would call "rednecks" are articulate, intelligent, creative, honest, respectable, well-read and logical people who think like Americans used to think not too long ago. Besides, I'm one of them, and frankly we feel that anyone who pisses and moans about what America stands for should get the hell out and do us all a big favor.

[euroman32589]

who the fuck is ted nugent?...i was watching richard dawkins

[kirk0respite]

i like the way people who know nothing about politics descide to crush sarah palin unlike ted who actually knows something about politics. your right ted i couldnt vote for sarah palin either because i want to vote for you!

[ConRevolutionary]

@TeslaDRayI'm not a conservative I'm a anarcho-capitalist,Con stands for propaganda of the deed.No I don't think freddie + fannie should have been monitored,they chose to give out loans to people who couldnt pay,that's bad business,they fail new business takes their place.You need a gov't that provides the 4 functions of the constituion,and protects private property.If a business acts illegally,people should have the morarlity to not participate with them,higher morales will correct corruptness.

[ConRevolutionary]

@TeslaDRay Environmental saftey is not an issue, China is a communist country and they have horrific pollution; far worse than ours, this is a completely regulated and controlled economy I might add. Workers are also safer in a capitalist system because they are rewarded for their labour, where as in a collectivist system the gov't takes advantage of the proles labour.

[TeslaDRay]

@ConRevolutionary

well people need to take personal responsibiliy and at the same time if there was any corruption on wallstreet, then that needs to be monitored. you can't just let everyone run wild like that. you don't think freddie and fannie should have been regulated better, which most CONSERVATIVES were for? thats why i said you need SOME gov, mainly for what you said and to keep businesses in check to operate LEGALLY, other than that, let the free market rock&roll.

[TeslaDRay]

@ConRevolutionary

nooooo absolutely not. that is the free market so long as businesses operate legally and safely, that's all i care about. and when i say safely, i don't necessarily mean with al gore's carbon taxes, lol. earth is warming regardless, so is mars. so when i say safely i mean worker safety and DIRECT environmental safety (avoiding toxic waste spillage or such). i know you get what i mean by now, i hope.

[ConRevolutionary]

@TeslaDRay So let me ask you this? Would you destroy a company that radically outpreforms it's predecessors?  A monopoly of sorts?

Also if we as a society can come together and be more united, as well as raise our morale standards I feel that there will be less illegal, mean spirited, and under the table business. But this should be by free choice of course, not coercion from a oppressive gov't.

[ConRevolutionary]

@TeslaDRay Businesses are far less corrupt, and the majority of business corruption (if there is any) is caused by a facist gov't, this bailout abuse was caused by the bailouts which were handed out by the facist system we use. Not the banks, and these banks were poorly run had we just let the market work it's system they'd fail, and new superior banks would appear.  But the chrony capitalism kicked in.

[TeslaDRay]

@ConRevolutionary

well what about regulating businesses fairly (note: when i say fairly, i say all businesses shouldnt be ahead of the game or behind, all businesses should have the freedom to succeed) but businesses abuse certain powers too, as well as government.

again, conrev, in general i agree with you i really do, i'm for ron paul personally, but look at it from all sides, that's all.