My video response to RedLetterMedia!

Here's my response to RedLetterMedia's recent video. I would love for him to review "Revenge of the Sith" and complete that trilogy! Because his reviews for "The Phantom Menace" and "Attack of the Clones" were great, and better then the actual films. So I hope he'll review "Revenge of the Sith" very soon! :)

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• RedLetterMedia
• Star Wars
• Movie reviews.

[Churchx77]

You kinda like Twilight but TPM and AOTC sucked? They might be flawed in many ways but theyre technical marvels. Nothing can save Twilight, not the story, to the mythology, not the actors, not the performances, not the directing, not the writing. Fucking moron.

[pizzamanchris14]

how can you like twilight and not the prequels? twilight is a fad, people will forget it very soon. star wars is universal and despite their flaws the prequels will be just as remembered as the originals

[Transformers217]

@MrCarkeys42 That's your opinion, and I don't like the prequels either. But those films were a "first" of their kind. Jar Jar Binks was the first CGI character ever created, and the digital sets were ground breaking. So you can dislike the films, but they were still ground breaking. And the reason that High Definition is in theaters, is because of the "Star Wars" prequels.

[Churchx77]

@MrCarkeys42 Youre not the judge of good taste here, dont talk to me.

[MrCarkeys42]

@Transformers217 oh man i am sorry, i thought you were still Churchx77, sorry for sounding mean, i thought he was still arguing me, no offense implied. none taken?

[MrCarkeys42]

@Transformers217 .............i thought that the digital "sets" looked like shit, no digital set was ever used in a good way because they should not exist. they look bad, it limits the actors, and it shows laziness, and high definition to the big screen? what the fuck does that mean? you cant have high def in a cinema, whatever........ look i see where this is going, i have no desire to get into some YouTube comment fight about the way films are made, so whatever, say what you like, i dont care.

[Transformers217]

@MrCarkeys42 Actually the "Star Wars" prequels brought High Definition to the big screen, and they were the first films to really use digital sets in a good way.

[MrCarkeys42]

@Churchx77 and i am not bias towards anything, i just don't like 1-3, they are honestly not good.

[MrCarkeys42]

@Churchx77 hey man, i was not trying to offended you or anything, i was just saying, yeah it looks great but was no technical marvel. the technology already existed and they did not advance it any farther, they just used it as much as possible. things like Jurassic park changed movies forever technically, that's what makes it a technical marvel. and star wars did not do any such thing. ok the old trilogy did, but the new ones did not.

[Transformers217]

@Churchx77 Episode 3 looks kinda out-dated now.

[Churchx77]

@MrCarkeys42 Wouldnt call them technical marvels? This shows about how deep your bias runs. Episode III is visually stunning. You're so full of shit.

[MrCarkeys42]

@pizzamanchris14 remembered BECAUSE of there flaws. that's a lot worse then something that's just forgotten.