PSA- R.H. BILL

A project of SHC's 4th year AB- Communication students for their Social Marketing subject.

Aljingky Atienza, Balong Agruda, Shirley May Macaraig, Angeli Mae Ragudo, Victor Nieva, Robert Limpin, Roje dela Rosa, and Kiko Crisologo

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• aaaa

[milhouse14]

@argentum0801 indeed. those outright hypocrites are hopeless.

[milhouse14]

@ainamaree you are terribly clueless and unquestionably misguided. The UN and WHO are not pro-abortion, they are pro-RH. they are pro-WOMEN's LIVES. They are merely protecting women's lives by lowering the number of maternal deaths brought by unwanted and unplanned pregnancies. They are merely championing a woman's right to good reproductive health and her right to LIVE! get your facts straight, cretin.

[milhouse14]

@ainamaree and what contraceptive is that?! care to expound?! just because one contraceptive may cause cancer does not mean all contraceptives are?! talk about hasty generalization. condoms have abortifiacient effects? care to elaborate on that one?! how about other modern family planning methods like tubal ligation and vasectomy? do they have abortifacient effects. go ahead. prove your case.

[milhouse14]

@ainamaree you are quoting a BIASED "pro-life" physician?! i mean, seriously?! you couldn't quote a physician who is neutral regarding RH matters?! how pathetic. In what universe is an opinion of one "pro-life" physician more valid and credible than the opinions of medical experts who belong to the U.N., World Health Organization, and the FDA who believe such contraceptives are NOT ABORTIFACIENTS.

[ainamaree]

@milhouse14 A line from ProLife Physicians "If this secondary mode of action prevents implantation of the embryo and causes an abortion, then the oral contraceptive would not be acting as a “contraceptive” at all in this instance; that is, it would not be acting “against conception.” On the contrary, it would be acting as an abortifacient because it aborts a human being."

Open your eyes.....

[ainamaree]

@milhouse14 If you didn't watch the debate in the congress wherein the doctor who was proRH BILL had a slip of the tongue. She said that "Yess contraceptive side effects is CANCER... errrr...... but we will find a cure for cancer in the FUTURE..."""" Realistic or stupid? CONTRACEPTIVES have ABORTIFACIENT EFFECTS!!!

[ainamaree]

@milhouse14 The UN, World Health Organization are for abortion! You didn't know that? Theyr'e behind world pop control... in 1998 they infused the Tetanus Toxoid Vaccine with the HCG. The effect would be that it would release antibodies that would kill a fertilized egg and render the woman 10years of contraception.. They distributed it to Women in Somalia, Africa, and the Philippines. They trained thousands of health worker in the Philippines to propagate abortion.

[ainamaree]

@milhouse14 Well if you prefer saving trees than babies then it is your opinion... I cannot say that "I am not my brother's keeper," because we all are. Join in the fight to raise a culture of death for your future family.

[ainamaree]

@milhouse14 Women who take in contraceptives are 200 percent more prone to cancer than those who don't. There is a big chance that let's just say there is already implantation in the womb, if a woman takes in contraceptives it will abort the implanted fertilized egg!!!

NOW TELL ME IF IT IS PRO-LIFE? PRO-WOMEN? or PRO-DEATH? Promoting a culture of death?

[ainamaree]

@milhouse14 I take it you understand how the faulty system goes. And RH BILL? How is is called PRO CHOICE if it is a mandated law? You have to follow, or else you will be penalized... How about Those who CHOOSE not to follow it??? Huh?? Pls explain the irony of it?! Contraceptives will be ESSENTIAL MEDICINES after the bill will be proven! ESSENTIAL? I am a registered nurse maybe you're thinking that I don't know anything @.@ ....