Rosie O'Donnell Still Pushing 911 Conspiracy Theories

http://radioequalizer.blogspot.com - talk about a stubborn mule: three years after misleading the public during The View regarding 9-11, Rosie O'Donnell is at it again. In fact, this is the second time in a week she's used her radio show to revisit her widely-debunked theories.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• talk
• radio
• rosie
• o'donnell
• 9-11
• conspiracy
• theories
• libtalk
• the
• view
• barbara
• walters

[janb214]

Operation North Woods: The US government's plan in the 60's to fabricate a terrorist attack on the US by Cuban terrorists. the plan was to make it look like the Cubans had highjacked a plane, and fly it into the White House. Thier reason for doing this? To get the American people to rally behind an Ameerican invasion of Cuba. The only reason this didn't go through was because Kennedy vetoed it. And people say there's no way 911 was an inside job.

[hpcwsd]

Americans are beyond IGNORANT to believe WTC #7 just imploded on its own! DUMMIES!

[helicopterraids]

rosie is being paid off to say this by the saudis

[dumdum5]

those who denies the official storie are conspiracy theorist but the other who stupidly believe all the government said are disgusting COLLABORATIONISTS

[4582012]

oil oil and oil many people sacrificed for oil

[disamjisa]

The idea that anyone is claiming "Bush did it" is absurd, it is so much more complicated than that. Well done R O'D for sticking to her guns; there is nothing to be gained but ridicule and scorn for speaking out on this

[TheYewtoobe]

the official story defys the laws of physics... what, like a magic bullet?

[janb214]

@seahorse1945 Carosene does not burn hot enough to melt steel, not to mention most of it would have evaportated with the initial collision. Also, as said by multiple architects and physicists, buildings do not implode naturally, the building would have fallen over, and the imacts were both too near to the top of the buildings. How was the steel on the bottom floors damaged almost as severely as the upper floors if no fire ever came close to them?

[seahorse1945]

@hpcwsd

It collapsed-not imploded!

[seahorse1945]

@webzenstar

Like the first attempt to blowup the WTC building? Get some help with the facts- Since before the 1990's it was known by many people from Cyprus to the US that radical islamists extremists want to hurt the USA and its people- their Jihad is to deal death to the "great satan" that is the USA Some were aligned with the Nazi under Hitler back before and during WWII. Why would that fact surprise anyone that knows that Islam was spread through violence via the profit Mohammed

[seahorse1945]

If the planes that hit the WTC buildings had just hit the very top, there would not have been a collapse due to pile-driving- but they hit much. much lower than the top of the building - as a result, "that's all brother " for that building. Seems to me a student with a basic BS degree in Civil engineering could have known that this would happen if a large fire were set 10 stories below the top of a tall building. 700 plus Deg F heat does Not do Steel structures any favors.

[seahorse1945]

@janb214

This "Operation North Woods " does Not prove anything regarding the structural steel damage that caused the destructive collapse of the WTC buildings . 650 deg F temperatures are enough to weaken steel members to the point of collapse in the same way that a steel bar can be bent over a camp fire and then wrapped around a tree by two men wearing thick leather gloves-- the unimaginable becomes reality. Then , gravity pile drives the lower portion of the building