NO on proposition H8

This is a parody of, and response to, the video called "YES on Proposition 8 (Prop 8) your rights".

Visit http://www.noonprop8.com/

(We are in no way affiliated with No On 8)

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• proposition
• prop
• same-sex
• marriage
• gay
• civil
• liberties
• equal
• rights
• religious
• freedom
• yes
• on
• Proposition
• preserving
• california
• families
• vote
• reasons
• reason
• protect
• decide
• support
• propisition

[IamKellyy]

I thought America is supposed to be the land of freedom, where people have their own human rights, haha, well guess thats not very true is it.

[Sourdeed]

Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Middle-Earth Zoo. Please don't feed the troll.

[GinnyStoleMyMan]

It's sad that people really don't see the similarity.

[riverchik21]

Yeah America is also a land where people have their freedom of speech! Everyone had their own right to vote as they pleased so yeah idiot it is true!

[whistlelocke]

i never attacked anyone, anyone's beliefs, and certainly never any eruptions. i merely was engaging in a constructive dialog about certain incongruities in the logic of your statements and suggested a valid way to enrich your mind and subsequent arguments via focused inquiries. hell, you could even use google!

furthermore, i hardly think you have an inkling as to the least of my beliefs. that cannot be dabated.

[mikeypryor]

But you see, they only have those "rights" in a certain number of states. So those rights as you call them aren't as basic as you think. You cannot just say humans can do whatever it is they please and just say that they have human rights.

[mikeypryor]

I don't think I once said that the movement was non-existent. I simply stated that the issue is fully erupted in today's society, and that cannot be debated. And a typical comment by someone of your beliefs is to not keep debating the topic, but to attack the person who is stating his or her opinion.

[whistlelocke]

mikeypryor,

in a word: yes.

the roles and rights of homosexuals has been the subject of law-makers since the world started turning.

the gay pride movement in the united states had it's start in the 1960's, with discussions about marriage soon after. just because the media, politicians, and agent provocateurs spin it up every four years in time with the election cycles does not mean that it is a brand new subject.

your rationale has glaring holes that a little research might help close.

good luck

[IamKellyy]

How is it hurtng them?

Just because they don't believe in it, it's not their lives, it's not like they have to have a gay marriage themselves. Just because a man loves another man or a woman loves another woman, they can't exactly help that can they, they can't help who they love, it's all part of nature, we are only human. If a man & a man (or females) want to spend the rest of their lives with each other because its their choice, then why the hell cant they, they have human rights.

[mikeypryor]

But what about the people who don't believe in gay marriage? Wouldn't it "hurt" them too if gays were allowed to marry?

[mikeypryor]

So you're saying that the gay marriage topic was as alive in the 70's and 80's as it is today?!