"Nose Out" at the Pentagon, No fade to black.

This was aired "live" by CNN after 11:00am. It begins with frame 33539 of the original US archive mpeg covering that time slot.

Shoulders, hands, whole bodies. The perps should have spent a bit more of the trillions of our money on quality help.

I no longer think it was SE of the pentagon, but more due east, slightly west of I395, near boundary channel drive. Opinions are solicited.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• blooper
• bloopers
• CNN
• pentagon
• hand
• bush

[merged]

fake...............

guess what., the internet archives have taken out all the videos when "the airplane" hit the south tower.

from 8 something to 9.30 or whatever time the mainstream were showing "live"

in the morning on 9/112001

[CNN911Fakes]

merged

You may be fascinated to know what the date was they initiated that clean up!

watch?v=QfJixNOF7Io

ps, it extends through most of the morning.

[cwhitfield1138]

If you would put this much effort into other areas like perhaps talking to a female then you'd be all set.

[CNN911Fakes]

cwhitfield1138

Always great to have a person view and comment who has his priorities in order.

[Tochvein]

What's wrong with this video? It's a reporter standing slightly out of shot. What is being proved here... you don't actually say what is wrong with this video at any point. How does that help your cause?

Or am I just missing the point?

[CNN911Fakes]

tochvein,

How tall is that reporter?

Why would they put a reporter on the opposite side of the building from the damage?

Why a camera? you figure they were expecting traffic jams in that field?

[feblex]

I don´t understand what`s the problem in this video

[hypobusa]

Where are the jet engines??

The seats??

The baggage??

The burnt lawn??

The trench in the ground??

[papercuts777]

@hypobusa Tomahawk missles don't have those luxuries.

[veedubxlr8r]

Yeah, if you're seriously trying to convince people of ANY sort of conspiracy:

LOSE the font meant to attract 8 year old kids,

GET RID of the pretty rainbow colors,

and PRODUCE a video with some professional QUALITY to it.

Then again, blurry, unclear videos go well with "conspiracy" documentaries.

Finally, LEARN TO SPEAK ENGLISH.

[JCwarfighter]

Yes, dead wrong. There would be engines at least if you believe everything burned up. If a plane crashed the jet fuel wouldn't burn the engines. The engine burns fuel hotter under combustion rather than spilled out on the ground.

[dontcensormebro]

"even though it's impossible to fake something like that on any kind of video-editing software."

wow where you have been. you sir, are dead wrong.

[MackQuigley]

You got good video and I love your dedication, but I wish I was able to understand your videos better. They confuse me.

They are all way too quick and pan around too much - I get lost. It's too fast for me to get what you trying to point out. Also I can't read that strange Disney font so quickly.

[whoo689]

You "9/11 video faker" truthers really take the cake. The original 9/11 truthers are crazy and paranoid enough, but you guys will take any little part of a video that "looks" suspicious and say automatically that it must be 'fake', even though it's impossible to fake something like that on any kind of video-editing software. Do you really think the media companies who filmed this shit had TIME to fake all these videos? It's absurd!

Total fail

[911morontwoofer]

So wait a tick...........Why CNN?

I would think Fox News?

How many people does CNN911Fakes think are involved in 911?

10?

1000?

10000000?

ROFL!

[adkinsjr]

FAIL - either this is another satire making fun of "911truthers" or its a FAIL. It's hard to tell the difference.

[PleaseDebunk]

Are you implying that the guys thumb merges with the man on the lawn?