WTC No Plane Truth (Part 15)
Loading...
Uploaded by muzicmaker2001 on Nov 23, 2008
An evaluation of many clips of Flight 175 and the lack of wake vortex
Link to this comment:
Uploader Comments (muzicmaker2001)
All Comments (345)
-
DUDE ! NO VORTEX BECAUSE THE PLANE WAS DESTROYED !!!!!!!
-
I did provide more than 15. Your argument is silly. Live/raw video of the planes hitting. Explain that away.
watch?v=Ys41jnL2Elk WTC 1 impact.
watch?v=w0hGDcGjGpk doug eisler
watch?v=glFk-JjFaT8 Jules Naudet
watch?v=qhfHFDPE1Sg Dwight Chief,Michael Morigi
watch?v=Z8NHM8Ax3Ho Kathlene
Faisel Abed, Anthony Bartolomey ,Evan Fairbank, MURRAY MURAD, Joe Cassaligi, William? Walsh,? Ralph Ramos, Richard Carletti, James Murphy, Barrett Hirsch, Kenneth Davis, many more
-
@muzicmaker2001 :53 "I could actually see something going into the building"
You ok great you found one guy who contradicts 1000's. This proves what? That you have a 99.9% failure rate with your hypothesis.
Like you asked me on your other video "Show me 15" witnesses. One? Your a joke.
watch?v=Ys41jnL2Elk
watch?v=mdSheSsNays
watch?v=z0BbtYi_I5U
watch?v=7U6KBtzoxp8
Video+witnesses saw a plane hit the building.
-
watch?v=r5o_-KItOZU Frame 4:10-"NO second plane, it was a BOMB"=no plane, ok?
And NIST (not truthers) says the jet fuel burned off in minutes.
“The initial jet fuel fires themselves lasted at most a few minutes" NIST, Sep 2005, PP 183
"But the jet fuel itself burnt in a matter of minutes, within less than ten minutes." -Lead Investigator Dr. Shyam Sunder, NIST
"Flight 11 carrying about 10,000 gals" (source:NIST NCSTAR1-5)
Know much about 911?
0:42RIAT 2011 - BAE Systems Typhoon FGR4 Rehearsal ...by RIATOfficial198,557 views
- 3:159/11 Fake: DEBUNKED! Live Footage No Plane Seen...by 911TruthVideos430,803 views
- 0:35Boeing 747 test footageby gillsabji103,645 views
- 7:55WTC No Plane Truth (Part 7)by muzicmaker200114,050 views
- 1:15FS9: Airbus Beluga landingby turylury242,028 views
- 1:50Aerodynamic Forcesby NASAconnect166,803 views
- 1:00Powerfull KLM 747-400 Take off!by drummingpilot6,667 views
- 2:30Sonic Boomby sciencemadefun31,590,967 views
- 1:42Russian Strategy Bomberby al672865,788 views
- 4:35Antonov 70, Aviasvit 2008by yarosIaw79,823 views
- 5:15911 Ghost-Plane, Plane Without AN Impact-Hole? ...by 911newsmagazin54,613 views
- 3:21WTC No Plane Truth (Part 4)by muzicmaker200118,169 views
- 2:56SOVIET-RUSSIAN AIRCRAFT PART-3 ILYUSHIN Video ...by dypinpavithran35,964 views
- 1:06Russian Flying Fortressesby ruzlanz4,548,591 views
- 9:53Jet RC BIG 29by djdjm6003,083,666 views
- 4:24FAA Wake turbulence testby unusmultorumm10,183 views
- 4:03Extraordinary Toroidal Vorticesby Evasius1,469,249 views
- 3:28The Megalodon Sharkby ElFuegoDeEnvidia22,340,096 views
- 5:24AIRBUS A400M - VDL 12.9by sonymagellan88,418 views
- 3:23Deadliest weapons ever invented- Metal Stormby cyborggermaine3,721,051 views
80 Tons of aircraft debris? You understand you are misinformed on that right?
What ticks me off is your dis-information is warping the minds of people like Jared Loughner and you don't even care about the consequences. Like some kind of game your playing that messes with people's lives..
MrRexquando 3 weeks ago
@MrRexquando
"try between 20-30,000 gallons"
Sounds like you are misinformed?
"you found one guy who contradicts 1000's"
More disinformation. Where are these thousands of witnesses? You can't even produce 15 out of the 8 million people in NYC. And ever wonder why none of the wreckage has been officially verified as being from the registered flights? Three guesses? Ok, here it is. There was no plane.
muzicmaker2001 3 weeks ago
@muzicmaker2001 So heres the thing you are wrong saying 80 tons of debris. FACT
The plane burns 8,000 LBS per hour which is about 1300 gallons. So even say it was flying for 2 hours it would have only burned 2600 gallons out of 30,000 it had on board. FACT
Unless you think NIST is totally 100% accurate. Are you saying that? If you are then you are a psycho believing them on some evidence and saying they lie on others?
MrRexquando 3 weeks ago
@MrRexquando
I think someone would be a complete moron for taking anything you say as FACT. You tour multiple pages on a quest to defend 911 at all costs, correct? So, you are not exactly a good source for unbiased info. But, NIST was just a reference. This is your fantasy, remember? No plane=no jet fuel=no massive fire=people walking directly on the steel supposedly heated to failure. Its simple if you have a brain.
muzicmaker2001 3 weeks ago