9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Dr Judy Wood, Madison, Aug 2007- Part 2/2

Dr. Judy Woodhas been researching 9/11 since 2001 and has already filed several law suits against NIST's contractors for science fraud, and legal requests that NIST's fraudulent data gets reexamined? Dr. Judy Wood has received more than one threat due to the research she has done and the evidence she has gathered, and one of her students was also murdered in 2006. Surprisingly, Dr. Judy Wood is the only 9/11 researcher who has submitted evidence to the courts in pursuit of the truth.

I. In 2007, Dr. Judy Wood filed several legal cases against the corporations NIST had contracted to conduct the 9/11 "investigations", many of which are military / defense / weapons organizations involved in Directed Energy research (huge conflict-of-interest). The filings in these legal cases included Requests For Corrections (RFC) based on the Data Quality Act, and Qui Tam whistle-blower cases. One of her legal cases made it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in October of 2009. She has been actively pursuing 9/11 Truth with her lawyer, despite the lack of support she has received from Dr. Steven Jones and other members of the 9/11 Truth community. The legal documents from her court cases can be viewed at the following links:

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_RFC.html
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.shtml

II. Dr. Judy Wood has collected an overwhelming amount of evidence which suggests that a Directed Energy Weapon of some kind was used to powderize ('dustify') the primary steel and concrete portions of the WTC buildings, while burning and bending aluminum, yet leaving paper and many other materials unharmed. These characteristics are matched by those of "The Hutchison Effect", and are the result of "field effects" and energy interference. John Hutchison has filed an affidavit in Dr. Wood's court case, to legally testify to the numerous similarities between The Hutchison Effect and the 9/11 attacks.

III. Dr. Judy Wood received her B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering), M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia. Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bi-material joints. She has taught courses including: Experimental Stress Analysis, Engineering Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials), Strength of Materials Testing.

IV. Here are some very important video documentaries discussing the reality of The Hutchison Effect and other suppressed technologies, such as Cold Fusion, Anti-Gravity, and Military Energy Weapon Technology, which are related to 9/11:

IV. Here are some very important video documentaries discussing the reality of The Hutchison Effect and other suppressed technologies, such as Cold Fusion, Anti-Gravity, and Military Energy Weapon Technology, which are related to 9/11:

1. John Hutchison & The Hutchison Effect (Documentary | 68mins): http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=5866006842090712676#
2. Heavy Watergate: The Cold Fusion Cover Up (Documentary | 45mins): http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6562030534380820378#
3. Boyd Bushman, a Senior Scientist of Lockheed Martin, on The Hutchison Effect: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57ZKTA7nx8U
4. Colonel Tom Bearden on Military Energy Weapon Technology (1985) similar to The Hutchison Effect: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MovpYUD7fTY
5. What Turned The Twin Towers To DUST on 9/11? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGXDmNZCeKo

http://www.drjudywood.com/
http://www.checktheevidence.com/
http://www.thehutchisoneffect.com/
http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/
http://www.edgemediatv.com/
http://drjudywood.co.uk/wtc/key.html
http://drjudywood.co.uk/

Dr. Steven Jones Helped Cover Up Cold Fusion, and now 9/11 Truth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j52uWQCqQ0A

HAARP is being used on the new madrid fault line
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaKMGx39UeM

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Madison
• Aug 2007- Part 2/2

[0TheChinaSyndrome0]

thank you judy for finally finding the truth about how it was done.

[AikenBruce]

@AAAXXX9999 To everyone who still is wondering how it happened I would like to direct you to the research of Nikola Tesla.

[newsmanbluesman]

nano-haze, fuzzy balls? - no way would media bookers use Dr Wood - a shame, where the evidence does require an explanation like hers

[newsmanbluesman]

Fused pair of handguns found in parked car and photoed in Fresh Kills as retained evidence. Of what, one is tempted to ask. But please Dr Judy, drop nicknames for phenomena eg toast, snowball, dustification. Like K Barrett DRGriffin and SJones, you can sound flippant - which is the temptation when illogic is boldy shoved at you and you're asked to swallow. I get it. But tone must be maintained & serious

[papapetad]

@belowthepovertyline Something I found out recently. Most door handles are made of aluminium. I always thought they were plastic until I started pulling many apart and sanding them back as part of the profession. "Oh, aluminium, cool" Also, many engines are made of alloy blocks and heads, some with alloy heads and cast iron blocks...overall mix of alloy, iron, steel parts. Also the detail of ONE car turned over while a half dozen right next to it aren't does seem odd

[maneatslion]

Right guys everyone here that sees this video demands the American Government reopens the investigation with an independent team of scientist's, engineer's, explosive experts etc. give a thumbs up to this comment. We have had enough of the lies and demand JUSTICE!!!

[belowthepovertyline]

@TwitSpotter Same to you, and have a good night.

[TwitSpotter]

@belowthepovertyline But you've got spirit man,,,good for you,,,stay with it...no hard feelings, good luck to you...

[TwitSpotter]

@belowthepovertyline Ah, now you're qualified to determine her "sanity," You're an expert on so many things. And so confident in your pronouncements. I would recommend sales work for you, but not science. Having worked with very advanced physics applications of next step propulsion, etc. which is beyond the training of mainstream physics, I am very accustomed to know-nothings casting aspersions. It used to bother me. Now I just smile, like I am smiling right now.

[belowthepovertyline]

@TwitSpotter But her arguments are based on JH's work, which hasn't been proven, apparently can't be replicated, and have only been poorly explained by the man himself. Well of course I'm skeptical!! As they say in medicine (since you brought it up), when you see hoof prints, think horse before zebra.  She sees overturned cars in the midst of collapsed skyscrapers and thinks "ah yes, levitation".

I'll check out Quackwatch, thanks.

[belowthepovertyline]

@TwitSpotter Yes, I have made up my mind about JW, and there isn't anything in her arguments that I (or anyone) need to remain teachable about. Her website is 1) a mess, 2) full of questions in lieu of assertions, and 3) seriously flawed observations. I haven't won anything because we're just bickering, not having an argument about JW's "evidence". I would not deign to carry this woman's books, thank you very much, her insanity might be contagious.

[TwitSpotter]

@TwitSpotter Should say you think you KNOW a lot more than you do-You might want to apply for a gig with the Skeptical Inquirer...I think they could use a guy like you-or maybe even "Quackwatch"-there's a guy who hasn't practiced a day of medicine in his life, didn't pass his boards, and rags on sincere doctors doing unusual and wonderful work outside the mainstream. You paint too simple a picture - a crime scene was criminally destroyed. Bless her for trying to make sense of it.