Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Creationisms Part 1 - "Contradictory evidence is just God testing our faith"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
645 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 26, 2010

This is the first part of the series because it is meant to cut off the foxhole cop-out that "God's just testing our faith, nothing you say matters!". In this video I demonstrate that this proposition is ridiculous because:

1. A test implies that God doesn't know the outcome, then how can he be omniscient?
2. If we fail and go to Hell, God is to blame because he created us and he knew ahead of time that that would be the case, so what's the point of the test?

Upon realizing that God isn't simply testing us, hopefully people will give the evidence a more meaningful stance in the scope of the debate.

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Venaloid)

  • Did you just push determinism (free will being one of the most debated subjects in philosophy) without giving it another thought or did I miss something? Or were you presuming a fatalist opinion on behalf of the creationists?

  • @JodaSFU - Yes, but only after noting that God is said to know everything including how our lives will progress, meaning that we MUST be fated to progress as he knows ahead of time we will. This, combined with the idea that he is the one who created us the way we are, yields my conclusion that God must therefore be knowingly sending us to Hell, meaning that he cannot be testing our faith since such a test would be pointless.

  • who's the comedian at the end?

  • @A5Hellcat - Bill Hicks, who has earned the AmazingAtheist seal of approval.

Video Responses

This video is a response to God Fails The Test
see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Of course, an even more basic question is: why would an omnipotent being even CARE whether you believed in it or not? Why would it be so insecure and egocentric?

  • That's one thing I never get. Eric Hovind in this clip seems to be making fun of the ridiculous early creationist arguments along the lines of "Satan planted the fossils", saying "Now we no longer appeal to faith, that would be just silly! Now we've got evidence." , yet, in other clips I saw, he's answering various questions with "Well, God says it, and I believe it, that's all you should care about."

  • @JodaSFU *presuming fatalism on behalf of the creationists.

  • @Venaloid Oh ok. So you're presuming fatalism. I just wanted to make sure you weren't presuming determinism, when there's still no clear answer as to whether or not we have true free will, and stating either as an absolute fact would be dishonest.

  • Is gravity a test too? Evolution is just as proven as gravity. We do have free will.

  • Is gravity a test too? Evolution is just as proven as gravity. We do have free will.

  • Is gravity a test too? Evolution is just as proven as gravity.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more