Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Legacy GT vs Mustang GT

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
15,091
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 30, 2008

2008 legacy GT stage 2 vs. 5.0 Mustang GT, mods unknown. Legacy won with a time of 14.52.
Location Bandimere speedway in Denver, elevation 6000feet.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (collegemt)

  • uhm 14.5 on a stage 2 lgt??? i ran a 14.3 stock.

  • @HideTheAsian: If you could read the description! This is at 5800 feet elevation. Even at this altitude I ran a best time of 14.0.

  • WOOOOO oh ya go Adam. You whipped his @$#. Man I can't wait to get out there and do it myself.

  • That mustang was pretty slow. I did race a 2001 camaro ss twice and beat it both times. I was preety suprised. The first time i raced him i got a crappy start but ran him down and passed him by the end of the track.

Top Comments

  • nice legacy, shitty mustang lol

  • You guys are missing a very important reason why the times might be slower.....

    Bandimere speedway in Denver, elevation 6000feet

    Yes elevation really does make a big difference...

see all

All Comments (28)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the mustang DRIVER sucks!!

  • @SickG6 dude, Stock LGT is still faster then Bolt-On 5.0

  • @SickG6 Wow that's really good. Here in Phoenix, AZ, stock '99 - '04 GT 5 speeds with decent drivers manage mid 14s. How you got 13.5 on street tires is beyond me but good job lol.

  • @gtdrummerdude I ran 13.5 with a stock 01 Bullitt Mustang with no midpipe and flowmaster catback on bald street tires.  If I can find my timeslip, I'll post it online and send you the link. So you're right, it's not necessarily the cars. It's usually driver error.

  • @SickG6 You're comparing a stock '83 or '84 car with a horrible driver to a 2008 car.... The fact is, late 1980s/early 1990s Mustangs with minor bolt-ons will do over 100 mph in the 1/4. A friend of mine has a 1988 GT 5.0 5 speed with cylinder heads and intake manifold from a late 1990s Ford Explorer 5.0 (stock production Ford heads), shorty headers, exhaust, and 3.73 gears and he was running 13.90s @ 102 mph on all-season tires and 13.40s on slicks.

  • 4 wheel drive ftw

  • Lol where was the Mustang. 5 litre engine and runs like 1.6 litre.

    0-60 mph in a legacy about 5 1/2 secs.

    0-60 mph in a Mustang = eventually. Lol

  • Let's not forget traction here. 500 horses do you no good if you sit there smoking you tires off, meanwhile the 250hp Subaru is halfway down the track.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more