Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

failed prophesies in the bible

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
541 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 1, 2008

if biblical prophesies didn't always go according to the plan, why should anti-mormons impose standard of perfection for the lds prophets?

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Jarkko1983)

  • theirs a reason you only get like 56 views, cause you use the bible improperly picking and choosing things without using context, this video is you straight up lying or being horribly misinformed about which verses coincide with the very end and which coincide with the time it was written, daniels end of days prophecies coincide well with the new testament ones

  • I don't talk about daniel, I gave just purely secular view of viewing bible literally. offcourse I understand that most things must be checked spiritually with different angel, but I just used the same standard the antimormons use when they critique Smith and that standard would destroy biblical prophets too.

  • lol you didnt show any failed prophecies just your inability to understand which ones are for the the far future, daniel is full of end time prophecies mixed in with the ones they are doing for that day

  • I wasn't talking about far future ones, Jeremiah prophesied the way zedekiah would die, yet it didn't hapen that way. Samson failed to deliver Israel also, in fact after samson was dead, israel was even more in bondage to the philistians.

see all

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Sorry, I found it . . . Nibley examined the scrolls and found that they were funerary texts for some guy. If you can find a copy of the Improvement Era from anytime between 1968 and May 1970, you will learn that the fragments are of an Egyptian funeral ceremony.

    They were found in the Metropolitan Museum.

  • Was this after the original scrolls that Joseph Smith translated were found in the 1960's?

  • that reference from year 1913 was non lds who said that lds can escape criticism because of the multiple meaning thing.

    Non lds egyptologist don't understand lds theology and thus they can't put together the interpretations of those facismiles egyptian meaning with the spiritual christian stuff, but it was their definitions that nibley used to show how the interpretations can really work in lds way aswell, but you haveto read those sources yourself.

  • Ok--reference a REAL Egyptologist (not from BYU).

  • well, the egyptologist in 1913 wasn't nibley neither is John Gee who has phd from yale on egyptology. Nibley also takes all his points from revered egyptologists and their studies, so u can call him a lunatic and exaccerator, but he has all the sources u can check and quite a few, Gee included has said that he never takes the sources out of context, even if you anti mormon lunatics who make mountains out of mole hills, would like to assure you without authoritative study.

  • Nibley is a lunatic who argues from a faulty position and has nothing to stand on. He likes to make mountains out of molehills where it credits the church and molehills out of mountains when it doesn't.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more