3-13 Interview With Garner Ted Armstrong - Christian Cult

Interview With Garner Ted Armstrong on John Ankerberg Show

TAP BELOW FOR ARTICLES ON WORLD WIDE CHURCH OF GOD http://www.rickross.com/reference/wwchurch/wwchurch10.html

http://www.believersweb.org/view.cfm?ID=625

Garner Ted Armstrong (February 9, 1930 - September 15, 2003) was an American evangelist and the son of Herbert W. Armstrong, founder of the Worldwide Church of God, at the time a Sabbatarian organization that taught strict observance of a seventh-day sabbath, holy days typically associated with the Jewish faith, and other observances derived from the Old Testament scriptures.

Armstrong initially became recognized when he succeeded his father as the voice of "The World Tomorrow," the church's radio program that aired around the world. A television program of the same name followed, aired mostly in North America, eventually giving way to a "Garner Ted Armstrong" broadcast, a half-hour program that mixed news and biblical commentary. His polemical message was unlike most other religious broadcasters of his day

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Sabbatarians
• Garner
• Ted
• Armstrong
• World
• Wide
• Church
• of
• God
• Cult
• John
• Ankerberg
• Seventh
• Day
• adventist
• observance
• law

[kmcl11]

@rapinNtapin Garner's own father kicked him out of wwcg. I will never forget that. A man will always be a man.

[rapinNtapin]

Herbert W. Armstrong God's true minister would of explained these answers perfectly to understand. The End-time Elijah!

[proSpiritofTruth]

that he is credited by God, writing through Paul the apostle, with reference to the book of Genesis also written by God,through Moses, where God, n this instance refers specifically to the Holy Ghost, c/- 2 Peter 1:20, "For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man:but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost." God is"That, both Who which, nothing greater can be imagined or exist."And since a three dimensional God is greater than a two dimensional God I rest my case.

[proSpiritofTruth]

without so much as considering giving the benefit of the doubt to their human rights in spite of the fact, that in priniciple, there has never been even an attempt put forward to suggest how that human beings can ever cease to be human beings from generation to generation. For example, Hebrews 7:9 declares three generations before Levi was conceived in Leah's womb, that he existed as a human being, while yet in the loins of his father(to be more specific, great grandfather Abraham, to the extent

[proSpiritofTruth]

I wonder if there is a possibility of the correct characters registered still declaring "Error, try again."

[proSpiritofTruth]

It is wisdom to take the safer option of risking thinking that the Holy Spirit is the Third Person in the Godhead and finding out that He is not a Person than to risk thinking that the Holy Spriit is not a Person and find out that He is. Why? How insulting and murderous is it to claim that an unborn child is not a person until some arbitrarily human devising, say 16 weeks gestation, thus depriving this unborn human being of human rights, and declaring that it is not murder to kill such a person

[proSpiritofTruth]

without sin." GTA has some good reasons for believing what he does, but clearly "Not enough" reasons, nevertheless,to justify what he believes without jumping to conclusions. If we deny the personality of the Holy Spirit,we are taking a very large bet on board,that because we cannot necessarily see that He is not only a divine infinite and uncreate Personality but equal in every way and One with them, as the Voice of God, whereas the father is the Will of God and the Son of God, the Word of God.

[proSpiritofTruth]

denies a commonsense explanation of how, so long as we keep in mind, that the Word of God is more emphatic in its declaration that Christ never sinned, we can correctly understand the term 'all' as used in"All have sinned and come short of the glory of God," to have it understood that Christ is the glory or character of

God and as such, this verse was wrtten for us to remember this as we read this so that there is no chance of us misconstruing it to include Christ, who "was made sin for us yet

[proSpiritofTruth]

because it conotates the blasphemous doctrine of the "Immaculate conception" not of Christ,but ofMary, who, as a finite,created beingwho, theWord of God declares had sinned, whereas Christ never has, is not now, nor ever will, sin. "All have sinned and come short of the glory of God." We are forbidden to twist the meaning to include Christ in His incarnation, for the reason that that interpretation cannot be applied without accusing the Word of God of contradicition. Such 'political correctness'