Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

WTC controlled demolition - likely technique exposed

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,372
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Jan 27, 2008

Molten steel was found in the debris piles of the Twin Towers and WTC 7. Moreover, the ruins of Building 7 included steel members that had been partly evaporated in extraordinarily high temperatures, yet the building had not even been hit by a plane.

NIST reported: "The WTC Towers and WTC 7 are the only known cases of total structural collapse in high-rise buildings where fires played a significant role."

The office fires would have been barely capable of melting aluminum, and certainly could not have melted steel or iron. Fires at any particular point would have only peaked for about twenty minutes as local combustibles were consumed, and given the relatively low emissivity of aluminum, consequent limited heat absorption, limited differentials between local gas temperatures and the melting point of aluminum and limited time that such temperature differentials would have been sustained, the amount of aluminum that could have melted would be far too low to persist in the molten state for a matter of days, much less weeks.

The forensic evidence included molten metal including steel or iron, heavily sulfidated steel, steel that was the equivalent of a "Swiss cheese", and partly evaporated steel members. It leads inexorably to a single conclusion: The WTC was demolished in a controlled demolition!

For further details please see http://www.takeourworldback.com/wtcdemolition.htm or http://www.takeourworldback.com/smokinggun.htm

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (exposedeceivers)

  • Nice work, some of the clearest shots-

    what is the "white paper released 2/3/64" @ 6:53?

  • The source is City in the Sky, Times Books, Henry Hold and Company, LLC, 2003, page 131, as quoted by Jim Hoffman's page at 911researchdotwtc7dotnet/wtc/a­nalysis/designdothtml#ref4

  • Here is what the Scholars For 9/11 Truth & Justice site says:

    Worthington, Skilling, Helle & Jackson White Paper

    A white paper on the structure of the Twin Towers carried out by the firm of Worthington, Skilling, Helle & Jackson contained eleven numbered points, including:

  • (cont.) The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707-DC 8) traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact.

    --City in the Sky, p 131

    stj911dotorg/evidence/wtcdotht­ml

  • Yea right. Next time we know you'll be telling us that black water boys did it and that some of the thermate was fired by helicopters...

  • Next time you'll be telling us that a flight school dropout who couldn't fly a Cessna was suddenly capable of flying a Boeing 757 with such aplomb that he could drop from about 266 feet a mile out to have the engines clear the lawn by a couple of feet as he hit the Pentagon 10 seconds later. And apart from the pitch, he managed to get the correct yaw and roll, and all whilst being thrown about by lateral forces varying from 1/2g to 2g. Or that burning paper can melt concrete. lol.

see all

All Comments (40)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • OK, to all those who are not patriotically blinded, I ask you this; The biggest lie in history, in your opinion is- (A) religion? or (B) 911? To all those who are blinded, I say to you this; FUCK YOUR NATIONAL PRIDE!! YOU GOT BRAIN-FUCKED!!!!!

  • plus the aluminum wings or fuselage couldnt possibly have damaged the solid steel beams of the inner core,

    Its a much softer metal and should have crumpled.

    However something took those steel beams out.

  • @ianupton nut

  • RE: USS Liberty

    Supposedly it was "mistaken" for an Egyptian ship half its size. BS! The Liberty had a huge satellite dish almost as wide as the ship. In 1967 satellite dishes were not in common use as they are today. Likely explanation: LBJ wanted to get into the war against Egypt and planned a "false flag" operation to be carried out by Israel and blamed on Egypt. The Israeli military at the time did not understand how to sink a US Navy ship with a good crew. False flag, like 9/11.

  • So you claim that just because this argument is taking place on youtube and not a court room I must be wrong but by that logic you just debunked yourself as well good job.

    Also I never claimed to have "absolute poof" you're the one throwing that word around. I believe there needs to be a real investigation because it's obvious to anyone with a basic understanding of physics that the NIST report is full of holes. Like what melted the metal and why the building came down at almost free fall speed.

  • If your so called "absolute proof" was worth the paper it was printed on you wouldn't be selling it on youtube to teenagers, you'd be in a court room.

    slider576 DEBUNKED!

  • So the fact that NIST lied about what happened means nothing to you?

    I would think that anyone with elementary level cognitive thinking would at least start to question what they had to hide. Do I really need to prove to you that jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel? It's funny how you guys always demand proof that they are lying but can never provide evidence to back up your claims.

    I find it hard to believe that you could even debunk the flat earth theory let alone 911inside job.

  • "#3 - Trying to, but judges don't want to go there either. April Gallup sued, Beverly Eckert sued, among others. If you can't impeach Bush for his war crimes, that should tell you something about the courts. It's rigged."

    Yeah, I know it's the New Wookie Order (NWO). Big Brother. They control it all.

    They have soooo much control that they couldn't even keep it secret that they leaked a CIA agent's identity.

    DEBUNKED YET AGAIN.

    THREE STRIKES, YOU'RE OUT felicity5150!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more