WTC controlled demolition - likely technique exposed
Uploader Comments (exposedeceivers)
All Comments (40)
-
OK, to all those who are not patriotically blinded, I ask you this; The biggest lie in history, in your opinion is- (A) religion? or (B) 911? To all those who are blinded, I say to you this; FUCK YOUR NATIONAL PRIDE!! YOU GOT BRAIN-FUCKED!!!!!
-
plus the aluminum wings or fuselage couldnt possibly have damaged the solid steel beams of the inner core,
Its a much softer metal and should have crumpled.
However something took those steel beams out.
-
@ianupton nut
-
RE: USS Liberty
Supposedly it was "mistaken" for an Egyptian ship half its size. BS! The Liberty had a huge satellite dish almost as wide as the ship. In 1967 satellite dishes were not in common use as they are today. Likely explanation: LBJ wanted to get into the war against Egypt and planned a "false flag" operation to be carried out by Israel and blamed on Egypt. The Israeli military at the time did not understand how to sink a US Navy ship with a good crew. False flag, like 9/11.
-
So you claim that just because this argument is taking place on youtube and not a court room I must be wrong but by that logic you just debunked yourself as well good job.
Also I never claimed to have "absolute poof" you're the one throwing that word around. I believe there needs to be a real investigation because it's obvious to anyone with a basic understanding of physics that the NIST report is full of holes. Like what melted the metal and why the building came down at almost free fall speed.
-
If your so called "absolute proof" was worth the paper it was printed on you wouldn't be selling it on youtube to teenagers, you'd be in a court room.
slider576 DEBUNKED!
-
So the fact that NIST lied about what happened means nothing to you?
I would think that anyone with elementary level cognitive thinking would at least start to question what they had to hide. Do I really need to prove to you that jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel? It's funny how you guys always demand proof that they are lying but can never provide evidence to back up your claims.
I find it hard to believe that you could even debunk the flat earth theory let alone 911inside job.
-
"#3 - Trying to, but judges don't want to go there either. April Gallup sued, Beverly Eckert sued, among others. If you can't impeach Bush for his war crimes, that should tell you something about the courts. It's rigged."
Yeah, I know it's the New Wookie Order (NWO). Big Brother. They control it all.
They have soooo much control that they couldn't even keep it secret that they leaked a CIA agent's identity.
DEBUNKED YET AGAIN.
THREE STRIKES, YOU'RE OUT felicity5150!
Nice work, some of the clearest shots-
what is the "white paper released 2/3/64" @ 6:53?
dfwtexxas 4 years ago
The source is City in the Sky, Times Books, Henry Hold and Company, LLC, 2003, page 131, as quoted by Jim Hoffman's page at 911researchdotwtc7dotnet/wtc/analysis/designdothtml#ref4
exposedeceivers 4 years ago
Here is what the Scholars For 9/11 Truth & Justice site says:
Worthington, Skilling, Helle & Jackson White Paper
A white paper on the structure of the Twin Towers carried out by the firm of Worthington, Skilling, Helle & Jackson contained eleven numbered points, including:
exposedeceivers 4 years ago
(cont.) The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707-DC 8) traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact.
--City in the Sky, p 131
stj911dotorg/evidence/wtcdothtml
exposedeceivers 4 years ago
Yea right. Next time we know you'll be telling us that black water boys did it and that some of the thermate was fired by helicopters...
Rastamafata 4 years ago
Next time you'll be telling us that a flight school dropout who couldn't fly a Cessna was suddenly capable of flying a Boeing 757 with such aplomb that he could drop from about 266 feet a mile out to have the engines clear the lawn by a couple of feet as he hit the Pentagon 10 seconds later. And apart from the pitch, he managed to get the correct yaw and roll, and all whilst being thrown about by lateral forces varying from 1/2g to 2g. Or that burning paper can melt concrete. lol.
exposedeceivers 4 years ago