occupy LSX are putting Free dom on trial for crimes against the occupy movement 1
Uploader Comments (psychodrilla)
Top Comments
-
And so another 'corporation' begins, hopefully the 'oath of office' will be held in honour. C'mon guys this is what the other corporation wants, divide and rule
Video Responses
All Comments (42)
-
I clicked liked as I think it’s important to get the message out there on these people. And how their goals and aims seem not to concentrate on bringing down a unjust system but are promoting their own personal aims and ambitions achieving this by whipping up a storm and getting hapless followers bewildered into believing they are standing strong together in a conviction against the 1%
-
@CommonlyKnownAsDom yes you do.
-
@CommonlyKnownAsDom I am. With Occupy. Whats it got to do with you?
-
@CommonlyKnownAsDom google it.
-
@jesterdream what is the occupy movement?
-
@jesterdream you need to do something more productive with your time instead of insulting me how about talking about solutions?
-
@jesterdream do i insult people or make up claims i can not prove or do i not do any thing lol you will and always are shown for your fruits in the end
-
@ConsumeToDestroy do people have to tell people they are doing work to get respect or how about just doing it
-
@ConsumeToDestroy for proof google tavistock institute occupy social dreaming to see the mi5s mind control branch have been running things from week one
-
@finditherefirst there is nothing of sense in what you write.
@psychodrilla There's this thing called correlation. Just because there were GA's in corrupted revolutions means nothing about this one. People are going to try to corrupt the movement, but does that mean that just because the people in the movement meet and talk that they have been corrupted and that there is no hope? No! Listen to how absurd what you are saying is! I know Dom thinks it's completely infiltrated etc etc but there are other more reliable, truthful sources, that believe otherwise.
ConsumeToDestroy 1 month ago
@ConsumeToDestroy do what you will enjoy it
but i will not be considered or accept that your group has any knowledge of how to change the way we live on this planet.
how ever i do and seeing words like revolution do not make me see anything positive from your collective
i notice you gave not answered my point about your ever so lucky 'squat'
no cannabis allowed?
your as bad as the people you claim to be revolting against,making rules and being 'funded' by 'donations'
ha right
psychodrilla 1 month ago 2
@psychodrilla No, not the old system, just a recognition that people are indoctrinated into this system.
For true anarchy to exist there needs to be a paradigm shift, a measurable change in the understanding of reason, and it's application. One tyrant can collapse the existence of anarchy as anarchy is without heirarchy, imposition, something that theoretically any single person can contradict. This is why a transitional period is needed.
ConsumeToDestroy 1 month ago
@ConsumeToDestroy i totally and fundemantally disagree
you are still feeding the monster
there is only change in a system when people stop using that system
just get on with it ffs
those who are doing it are getting on with it
i am, i dont need a general assembly to start calling itself the 99% cos i aint part of that
just get off grid.live on the black market cash only pay only vat no other tax no bank account that way the system is starved
n we will change
those who can do
psychodrilla 1 month ago
@ConsumeToDestroy not the old system?
they had general assembly in the russian revolution, totally corrupted and co opted from the start
china same
just about every south american country all had people claiming to be the voice of the people
all corrupted from the start cos they all followed the same format
look at yourselves
what have you accomplished? nowt
now your in cahoots with the tavistock institute?
no offence but get real and get on with ;living on planet best way
psychodrilla 1 month ago
@gripmylength Being an active member of a working group can be defined simply as becoming involved in that group's events. If you are part of the Caretaking team and you say you'll clean x, y, and z, then it can be seen as to whether or not someone did very easily, likewise if someone did not.
In relation to how previous involvement may help, then it'd be based on whether or not a deemed trustworthy source could testify on your behalf.
ConsumeToDestroy 1 month ago
@ConsumeToDestroy so no actual change then just the same old system set up by the tavistock institute and chatham house and its very opaque system of closed door management
so sad to see people so duped by the system that they think it can be fixed by proven failed and corrupt legal vocabularyso is it a squat or rented premises all hooked up with online capability
wow what a great squat
how convenient for you
psychodrilla 1 month ago 3