A juxtaposition between an uneducated ignorant doomed to repeat history, and someone who's chosen to enlighten himself and learn a thing or two about what happened before in human history.
What I find interesting is who is reading their statement with no facts, and who recites his factual examples from memory.
Who is more likely to be accurate in his understanding?
Which will you choose to listen to?
Link to this comment:
All Comments (1)