Calgary Flames 2004 Playoff Conspiracy
Top Comments
All Comments (714)
-
ESPN Recap:
Calgary almost won it on a power play midway through the third, but Nikolai Khabibulin stuck out his right leg to stop Martin Gelinas' rebound attempt perilously close to the goal line. Multiple TV replays did not conclusively show the puck crossing the line.
"It's got to be conclusive," Sutter said. "I looked at it from two different angles, and unless they have a different one, you can't say that it's a goal.
-
puck was kicked in anyway. no goal.
-
Yeah we'll get it back as soon as Sutter gets fired and feaster does something more then get us Jones and Cammy.. as much as I like them both I think its time for some massive names to come to calgary.
-
It's not a conspiracy, it was in, Gary Bettman covered it up.
-
@offtherock11 I'm a flames fan. I don't completely think that it was in, but it's just a very debatable issue, i could have crossed the line more after that picture, or that could be from the moment the puck hit the pad.....
-
That puck wasn't in the net... understanding angle distortion isn't that hard of a concept...
-
IT WAS IN, BUT THE PLAY WAS TOO FAST, EVEN THE FLAMES THOUGHT IT WAS A SAVE! I REMEMBER THE FLAMES DID NOT ARGUE WITH THE REFS IT WAS IN.
-
@sasprawler Nah, it wasn't a picture, it was a screenshot from a video, so they took the shot of when the puck was furthest back.
-
I'm a flames fan and even I have to say: get over it! it was almost 8 years ago!!!! you morons there's nothing you can do about it so move on!
-
LOL CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY LOOOOOL
As much as I hate the Flames, that goal was in!
Fuck Gary Betteman
cheesesteakphilly 4 months ago 9
I viewed and reviewed the replays, and although I am a Flames fan. The right call was made. There was no replay that conclusively put the puck over the goalline. The one replay that confuses many is the one that the puck is in the air and gives the appearance of being in.
MrDaemonB 5 months ago 4