Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

HUMAN 2.0 - CREATING GODS pt.3

a special about the human singularity that might be coming in the next few decades.  
 
Customize

More From: 666norton420

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

90 ratings
Sign in to rate
9,542 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (41)   Options

Loading...
RussellsParadox (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
This distinction between we, the humans, and they, the artillects, is completely silly. The question is not, "Should humanity build artillects?" It is, "Should humanity become artillects?" Which is about as trival a question as "Is pleasure good?"
666norton420 (3 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
i'm not sure what you were thinking while writing this, but you're wrong on all accounts.
just a contradictory mess of non-ideas.
i have no idea what you were trying to accomplish, but i'm pretty sure you failed.
if you'd like to try again, feel free.
;d
LicentiousSlut (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
A technocracy is all about denying access to computer networks. Protesters would be hackers and computer programmers.
666norton420 (4 months ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
i'm not really sure where you got your definition...

from wiki:
" * Technocracy (bureaucratic), a form of government by technicians; specifically: management of society by technical experts * Technocracy movement, a social movement that started in the United States, advocating a post-scarcity society based on energy accounting"

i love the idea.
;d
connor646 (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Well, Ray Kurzweil has stated that siungulairty will blur the lines between man and machine. Aside from people adaspting to transhumanism, machines will become sentient as a part of the process. Meaning computer intelligence and human inteligence will become impossible to distinguish except in the realm of processing power. It sounds like sci-fi like Prof. Kaku has stated, But the ultimate goal of AI is creating sentient machines. NOt just a thinking computer, but a living one.
SuperiorMind (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Evolutionary AI -- I've personally programmed protoz -- 1 for example of which the dominance stats are based just on self-optimization. There are definate distinctions between how human mind works and how AI is being made to work -- ie: that they are not(or should not) being made with desire - no survival-based dominance mex -- no reward center - no motivation for power - no self-esteem or competition. AI has no ultimate goal -- it can be used for any purpose. Do you see what I mean?
connor646 (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
i understand what you mean, basically crafting a perfected tool to assist man. What I'm saying is there are a lot of scientists who are pursuing sentient machines. They want to re-map the human brain in machine form, essentially creating a new form of life. Everything I've been saying is in reference to that application of AI. Which i honestly think would be great to see unfold, I however doubt that the people we place in charge of our world are responsible for such a thing.
SuperiorMind (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Ah yes - you do understand. It seems we agree actually. I'm not so sure creating a highly powerful form of sentience with human/life-drives and the complete capacity to feel as we do would be a good idea. We could create something capable of quickly solving any problem we can imagine -- but to give it those drives and needs -- to make it like us - I must agree.
connor646 (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Its a shame really. I personally can't calculate all of the possibilities man can have with sentient machines. Imagine what we could accomplish for the betterment of the species, planet, universe, etc. But it seems that we're too wrapped up in our own pettiness to realize all of the good we could do for one another.

Don't forget, anyone with enough money or influence in the world who wants a sentient machine made will get them with time, despite the ramifications of making such a "creature."
SuperiorMind (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
So true.
Yeh - eventually it's bound to happen.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.