RevConradTillard.wmv
Top Comments
All Comments (65)
-
No comment.
-
I love this great mosaic philosophy that "ministers" quote. Ministers are to call men and women to repentance, whether white or black, male or female, Jew or Gentile, Protestant, Catholic, Budhist, Muslim, Hindu, agnostic or athiest and faith in Jesus.
-
Except that each response was substantive.
You do not seem to be able to discuss things without getting upset. Are you sort of young?
-
You really live in a fantasy world. Each of your responses is pure, as you say, nonsense.
-
1. See? You were wrong again.
2. I have read it. No warnings. Advice only.
3. Nonsense. Cheney was NOT in charge of the Hart Rudman Report. Spouting nonsense does not make you right.
4. Missing -- wrong again. You have a serious problem with details.
5. Read it. There was no actionable intelligence. None.
6. Well known truth!!!
-
1. I meant Clinton's people
2. Read the report
3. Cheney was put in charge of responding to the Hart/Rudman report. He did NOTHING
5. Read the memo. Not vague. Why did he not due what Clinton in 1999 and put all security agencies on high alert. 6. LIE
-
Well, if I am a typical right winger, why did I think that going into Iraq was a mistake? Why is it that I think that Bush was a failed President?
You seem to be very gullible and get your facts wrong.
1 How could "Clarke and Obama's people" have warned bush? Obama was not even in government. Silly.
2. Hart Rudman did not warn about anything.
3.4. Cheney was not in Charge.
5. Bush was not warned in August except vaguely
6. Clinton failed to arrest Bin landen and stop the attacks.
-
I apologize. I was right the first time. You are a typical right-winger. You ignore the facts and attack people on some trumped-up personal shortcomings.
FACTS
1. Clarke and Obama's people warned Rice and Bush II's people that terrorism should be their number one issue.
2. The Hart/Rudman Commission warned the Bush II administration.
3. Bush II put Cheney in charge.
4. Cheney did NOTHING
5. Bush warned in Aug. 2001.
6. We were attacked when it could have been prevented.
-
No, I have admitted the truth. The truth is that Clarke is a self serving, finger-pointing bureaucrat who failed in this duties. He himself admits he failed.
And though you are wrong about me being a libertarian, my "political" or "religious" or "social" views have nothing to do with who Clarke is, what he has done or what he himself has admitted to.
-
Gullible? If you can't admit the truth about Richard Clarke there is no hope. You right-wingers attack people instead of investigating the facts. I am sure you are not a right-winger but a "libertarian." In other words, living in a fantasyland.
Thank you Rev. for standing up against the hate and FEAR!
betterdays105 2 years ago 10
Great speech by the rev.
The right winger extremists like Beck and Limbaugh needed to be called out for what they are doing.
RiyazGuerra 2 years ago 6