Claim # 32. Radiation would have killed the astronauts.
In this episode, we look at the Soviet Manned Lunar Program and consider what obstacles, other than radiation, the Soviets had to overcome to put a man on the moon. The evidence clearly shows that no matter what the Soviets said to Lovell in 1963, they were still in competition with the United States to be the first at everything in space. Regardless of what Jarrah says, radiation wasn't the reason a Soviet cosmonaut was not the first man to walk on the moon.
Yeh, all those concipiracy delusionists have paranoidic schizophrenia. They belong to asylum. Or they are just clever conman who deliberatery lie - knowing: There are always lunatics who buy their crap. Hope you didn't buy that "book" - waste of money - and asshole get rich.
Btw my idea: Scan that kind of books and put them freely on web and you deserve public service medal, cos' that will hurt "the author" most.
You show no respect when you edit a film to your advantage, take words out context and claim past tense is used as evidence of current tense. You have no right to lecture others on respect. Now, tell us all why radiation would have rendered the Apollo missions prohibitive... in your own words. Can you do that li-awe? If not, why do you refuse to do so. Now, go get fucked you odious little twat.
Well luke philweb just confirmed my point, so please go find out what space radiation is and feel free to come back and give me some good arguments. Also you are going to far with name calling and for that reason only I will debate you any more till you can show some respect to other people. It is not the first time Luke, that people tell you this. Respect is the base Luke, so I hope you can that.
You have had it explained to you. You edited the video, and took a quote of context. Now, in your own words, explain space radiation to us all. Why did it prohibit the moon landings. You are not being very truthful for a twoof seeker are you? Do you get a buzz out of this lie-awe? I think you are boring and tedious, and I really hope you go away soon, even it that is your own choice or the choice of NASA? Wink wink lie-awe, wink-wink ;) Cioa lie-awe.
Question NASA Apollo 8, is a good start for you there the Apollo 8 is stating that Dr van Allen was convince they would be fried. Or do you think Apollo 8 crew is lying ytmoog?
Show me one paper by one physicist from any country any time in the last 40 years which shows that a short duration in the VABs would give an astronaut a dangerous radiation dose.
A paper by Van Allen would be ideal.
Why is this so hard for you to show actual evidence?
No, van Allen was not convinced, he was concerned... those two things are differenet. You've had it explained to you that they were concerend they 'got fried'. Got is past tense, which implies that van Allen recognises they made it throught the belts. you have quote mined and taken words out of context. Now explain in you own words why radiation would have made the Apollo missions prohibitive.
You just jump around from question to question. I just wanted to droof with my Question NASA Apollo8 video that Dr James van Allen still was "convinced".
Yeh, all those concipiracy delusionists have paranoidic schizophrenia. They belong to asylum. Or they are just clever conman who deliberatery lie - knowing: There are always lunatics who buy their crap. Hope you didn't buy that "book" - waste of money - and asshole get rich.
Btw my idea: Scan that kind of books and put them freely on web and you deserve public service medal, cos' that will hurt "the author" most.
harolze 3 months ago
BRAVO!
PuNkRoCkRuLz1 1 year ago
@awe130
You show no respect when you edit a film to your advantage, take words out context and claim past tense is used as evidence of current tense. You have no right to lecture others on respect. Now, tell us all why radiation would have rendered the Apollo missions prohibitive... in your own words. Can you do that li-awe? If not, why do you refuse to do so. Now, go get fucked you odious little twat.
lukequixotesanjose 1 year ago
@lukequixotesanjose,
Well luke philweb just confirmed my point, so please go find out what space radiation is and feel free to come back and give me some good arguments. Also you are going to far with name calling and for that reason only I will debate you any more till you can show some respect to other people. It is not the first time Luke, that people tell you this. Respect is the base Luke, so I hope you can that.
Peace to you
awe130 1 year ago
@lie-awe
You have had it explained to you. You edited the video, and took a quote of context. Now, in your own words, explain space radiation to us all. Why did it prohibit the moon landings. You are not being very truthful for a twoof seeker are you? Do you get a buzz out of this lie-awe? I think you are boring and tedious, and I really hope you go away soon, even it that is your own choice or the choice of NASA? Wink wink lie-awe, wink-wink ;) Cioa lie-awe.
lukequixotesanjose 1 year ago
@awe130
Still no answer. Oh well.
Your video is an excellent example of quote mining and creative editing on your part.
I want actual evidence not your dishonesty.
In other words, ANSWER THE QUESTION.
One paper by any physicist from any country in the last 40 years.
ytmoog 1 year ago
@ytmoog,
Question NASA Apollo 8, is a good start for you there the Apollo 8 is stating that Dr van Allen was convince they would be fried. Or do you think Apollo 8 crew is lying ytmoog?
Peace to you
awe130 1 year ago
@awe130
No, I still have the same question.
Show me one paper by one physicist from any country any time in the last 40 years which shows that a short duration in the VABs would give an astronaut a dangerous radiation dose.
A paper by Van Allen would be ideal.
Why is this so hard for you to show actual evidence?
ytmoog 1 year ago
@awe130
No, van Allen was not convinced, he was concerned... those two things are differenet. You've had it explained to you that they were concerend they 'got fried'. Got is past tense, which implies that van Allen recognises they made it throught the belts. you have quote mined and taken words out of context. Now explain in you own words why radiation would have made the Apollo missions prohibitive.
lukequixotesanjose 1 year ago
@ytmoog,
You just jump around from question to question. I just wanted to droof with my Question NASA Apollo8 video that Dr James van Allen still was "convinced".
just stay with the subject.
Peace to you
awe130 1 year ago