Ann Coulter and Glenn Beck on CPAC and the Liberal Media

Glenn Beck.
(3-2-09).

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• glenn
• beck
• ann
• coulter
• cpac
• liberal
• bias
• media
• fox
• news

[computerpurple]

I saw this today on t.v.. Im a fan of both. Thanks for posting this.

[jimbad05]

The hateful rhetoric that people on the left have for Beck, Palin and Limbaugh never ceases to amaze me. I used to buy into the whole "Rush is terrible" crap too, until I actually listened to him. I didn't find an evil man intent on murdering puppies, I found a sensible guy who uses news and facts to back up his arguments, with some comedy and mocking of those on the left as well. My trust for the media, who sneeringly derided Rush, was gone that day.

[bdoughty814]

Conservative or Liberal. Black and White. Yeah cause the media isn't just making the elaborate system of economics and politics totally two sided to get people angry and fighting for views and money. Use your brain. Read history, look at facts, be rational. Quit being a bunch brainwashed coolaid drinking news watching zombies and open up a fucking book. I'm talking to Conservatives AND Liberals.

[antonleveyisgay]

spoiler! he was watching gay porn

[biffybiffybiffybiffy]

Ann Coulter.... frigid.... but i would destroy that cunt

[tangogonzo]

Adams apple

[Blky9876]

why isnt Ann Coulter on some kind of daily show? She knows so much so why not help educate us?

Im tired of Rush telling me what to think, Beck tells me to go find out stuff on my own but with Ann C, i feel like she does the thinking for me

[jimbad05]

@bs17 It's a valid slippery slope argument. As I said, we need look no further than our mother country, Great Britain, where the Catholic Church has been forced out of providing adoption services because they won't adopt children to same-sex couples. This is not paranoia - religious activities are already being curtailed in the western world. (Well, strangely it only seems to be Christian religions. In GB, Catholic nuns can't run orphanages, but Muslims can use Sharia courts, but I digress...)

[bs17]

@jimbad05 Equating the gay marriage with the destruction of religion is one of the more asinine slippery slope arguments I've ever heard. As for your "these people are not really about acceptance," I can tell you as a gay person that all I want is to be extended the same legal protections and opportunities as straight people. How you can possibly construe that to be a front for destroying religion is beyond me, and frankly is indicative of why you defend cartoon characters like Glenn Beck.

[jimbad05]

@bs17 The Mormon Church once took a more unkind view of blacks than they do today, but they endured public pressure and eventually changed their views in the 1970s. As more and more Churches give in to LGBT demands, I fear traditional Churches could someday become a hated minority institution. Furthermore, what about religious orphanages? Should they be forced to shut down or adopt to gays? I doubt LGBT demands would stop with civil union rights. Those people are really afteracceptance,notrights

[bs17]

@jimbad05 Yes, it would really stop there -- churches have Constitutional rights under the first amendment that allow them to exclude people from their congregations. That sort of freedom of association has been upheld numerous times by the courts for all sorts of organizations. Furthermore, I doubt many LGBT people would want to be married in a hostile church that was forced to recognize them.

[jimbad05]

@bs17 Civil marriage licenses are something I would support, provided Churches and individuals have the right to disagree - but would it really stop there? Wouldn't some in the LGBT community continue to advocate for marriage? Wouldn't they continue to protest and yes, attack, Churches that didn't support their lifestyle? It's essentially a slippery slope argument, and an informed one, given the current state of affairs in Britain and Canada.