1. David Hume's Fork and Immanuel Kant's Synthetic A Priori

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
8,069
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 12, 2010

David Hume's Fork and Immanuel Kant's Synthetic A Priori

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (drjasonjcampbell)

  • get that kat as a tat ,

  • @3skeletons ...you evil sh$t!!! LOL. Now it's infected my brain!!! WOW what a suggestion!!! BWAHAHAAH!!! I just may have to, GENIUS!!!

  • @3skeletons ...not only will I get the tat. I'll give you a shoutout for being so powerful a mind as to get me on THAT level...that's what I'm all about!! Your words my friend VERY VERY powerful!!!

  • Point 1 = Nominal Equivalence in that cat and mat are meaning conventions.

    Point 2 = The is definite and on means "IS INCLUDED OVER OR NOT UNDER NOR BESIDE"

    Point 3 = Epistimologically the observer merely saw a drawing of a cat or a synthetic representation of a cat not the cat in itself.

    Point 4 = Surrealistic in that only a representation of the mat and cat were observed.

    Referances = The Treachery of Images, Wikipedia

  • @PEATANTICS ...Gangster...love the various conceptual takes on a philosophical classic...

Top Comments

  • I'm a philosophy student and I've seen A LOT of drawings of cats on mats. I must say Dr. Campell, your depiction is by far the best I have come across! A+

see all

All Comments (43)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • you are a good teacher.

  • Thank you for uploading this. I hope that this video helps me understand Kant better.

  • @PEATANTICS I must surely speak for everyone...what on Earth are you on about?

  • Why is it called a fork

    Forks are utensils

  • I think you need to stop starving your kitty cat...it looks so thin.

  • @SalmonJanetOle because the proposition's predicate is not contained within the term itself, you must synthesize the subject with something outside of it in order to establish truth. "All bodies have weight" <-- the word "body" does not imply any weight necessarily.

  • I do not need to apologise for this drive by shooting.

    The claims are as robust and immutable as gold.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more