WTC7+BBC Part 2
Uploader Comments (SpudXXXX)
All Comments (9)
-
For someone like you, there is no way you would ever believe your government would do this. Ever heard of the Gulf of Tonkin? How about Operation Northwoods? Is that human error? No, it was our government lying to us in order to go to war. Fact.
-
No it's not a matter of believing BBC, it's a mater of I'm sick of all these stupid conspiracies about 9/11 which turn every single mistake into a conspiracy without taking into account the simple fact that is human error.
-
It makes me wonder if the WTC7 demolition was delayed for some reason... could the explosion that sent Barry Jennings flying be some explosives that went off prematurely?
Also, if BBC had heard that it was about to collapse, why would they report that it had? Can you imagine that conversation? NY-"Now reporting WTC7 is about to collapse..." BBC-"Wait, I didn't understand what you last said! Collapsed or about to collapse? Ah whatever, it's not important..."
-
It wasn't just that tape they claimed to have lost bro, it was the tapes of the whole day of 9/11. Unbelievable for a leading world news organisation to loose tapes of the greatest news day of our lives. Oh! They didn't loose them till this story broke. Also note that many broadcasts don't show the time anymore. Why?
A woman emailed the BBC to say her 13 year old son taped the whole day and still had the tapes. She asked, 'Are you telling me that the BBC are not as conscientious as my boy'.
-
They thought they could quietly get rid of it, but that just caused even more of a stir. It's pretty simple actually.
You obviously are very eager to accept the BBC account at face value. I mean it's not like there was one of the biggest screw ups in BBC history on that tape... I'm sure it was just a mistake...
-
Well not really that incredible of a coincidence when you consider how many reporters would want to use that video footage, each and every one of them with a potential to misplace it. If they intentionally did it don't you think they would remove it completely rather than simply moving it one year over? If you found money ontop of a table would you hide it under the table if you wanted it to never be found?
-
What an incredible coincidence that would be... the one tape that really matters, got misplaced. Ok so how do you explain the unreacted thermate found in the WTC dust? Coincidence?
-
Well there is the fact that if they had to use the archieved footage they would of had to remove it and put it back, which means during that process it could of very easily been misplaced. It's like going to the library, taking out a book, not checking it out and then putting it back on the shelf in the wrong spot.
-
Wow, it was misplaced in the 2002 sector? This is the biggest (public) story in decades, and they just went 'OOPSIE WRONG SHELF'. I'd say this is fucking bullshit,
Watch the video response
watch?v=XBXep2fB3_U
The BBC are guilty as hell.
SpudXXXX 2 years ago
How strange... the video was "misplaced", then found recently? I'm sure the archive footage of 9/11/02 was stored as well, but where did they put those tapes? In 2003 section? In the years following 9/11 they have never used ANY of they archive footage from that day? They really think we are complete idiots to not figure this out.
WhyNotTruth 3 years ago
You got it in one. Very eloquent! Well done WhyNot!
SpudXXXX 3 years ago