Libertarian Feminism is Superior to Liberal Feminism

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
17,864
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 9, 2011

http://adamvstheman.com

###
One of the things we have to look forward to in the shift to a more free society, is the elevation of women. It's no secret, that historically, men have dominated society, and it should be no surprise that a system based on forcing people to go along with the will of government results in patriarchy. This is generally due to our obvious physical advantage and psychological programming to dominate as the alpha male.

We evolved with different strengths in women and men to ensure overall survival and reproduction, not in our current, technologically advanced society, but in a state of nature. More than any real edge, this gave men the ability to dominate others by force. Fortunately, wisdom is catching up with technology, and people are realizing that dominating others by force, IS NOT to anyone's REAL advantage.

In terms of traditional measures of economic productivity, men still enjoy an advantage from physical strength that is being rendered less relevant every day by automation. But men's advantage that results from that physical strength being applied to other human beings, is a different issue. While there are plenty of female cops and soldiers these days, certain fields will always be male-dominated. When statism rules, when aggression against others is tolerated, men's physical advantage will be a real economic advantage as well.

While women vote for statist politicians too, men dominate politics, law enforcement, and the military. These are not things for women to aspire to, but to lead men away from! Why should women want to engage in the same destructive behavior of dominance? It is as if some women are trying to assert their equality by trying to match the worst that men are capable of! Women have a much greater power and a much more important role to play. Women should not seek to compete with men in the fields of dominating others, in politics, in law enforcement, or in the military, but rather continue to set the example of NOT dominating others by force. But then, who the hell am I to think I should be telling women what to do.

Creating liberty requires empathy for the will of others. For all the essential virtues of men, it is time to take the lead of women, at least until we all learn that freedom is the way forward, and we can evolve past social systems based on force and coercion. Feminists tend to think that instituting a stronger government can lead to greater gender equality, but an institution premised on the initiation of force, inherently favors those best at using force. Fortunately, the historical trend is clear, and violence is less prevalent in our daily lives than ever before. As we become more free in general, the playing field shifts to the advantage of women, as it should.

Women have shown themselves to be as capable as men as administrators of government, but it is the willingness of men to be the enforcement of government that makes it possible. It is men's willingness to subjugate and to follow orders that keeps government going. While women bear a certain share of the responsibility for the world's problems, let's be brutally honest: when it comes to the destruction of liberty, it's the men who lead the way. To achieve the free society that we know is within our reach, let us put down the arms of government and acknowledge that we are all free, beautiful, independent, human beings, who aught to be the alphas of our own lives.
###

Everything in this video is fair use, no copyright violation intended, but please feel free to repost just in case it gets pulled anyway!

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Why does it matter if you have a penis or a vagina? Or dark skin or light skin? All people are individuals that are responsible for themselves and are inherently unique in their own way. Feminism is another word for those seeking special rights. Have some damn personal accountability people.

  • @fidelbogen Feminism's greatest power may be its amorphousness. "Oh, I'm not like that!" or "Well, they aren't TRUE feminists!".

    Also, "misogyny" is usuaslly just a bludgeon term used by feminists.

see all

All Comments (554)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I don't agree with libertarianism for today's world but eventually it would be best... But need to protect it, conservatives are infiltrating and twisting it, just like the GOP changed the meaning of conservatism from the more original meaning, like in oakshotts writings.. Keep libitarianism from adopting republicanism ideas just to grow because overs yrs libertarianism will not be the same thing

  • FEMALES OF TODAY ARE SO DISGUSTING WITHIN, NO WAY I'M? MAKING MOVE ON THEM.

  • This seemed less about feminism and more about chauvinism. Misleading title. I through how he was going to explain that the democratic party usually enforces gender stereotypes by allowing certain individuals to represent them. For instance, Bill Clinton is a pervert yet is still labeled a hero by the left. Or the "vote or die" rhetoric with the most anti-women rappers in the music industry. If men need to do anything, it's to step up and use our God given aggression to protect women's virtue.

  • disgusting feminism

  • Feminism = Socialism with tits

  • Feminism sucks in any scenario....and yeah I'm a Guy and yep I said it...hell with feminism...I respect Classy Women that can think for themselves personally. Feminism is just a greased up politically correct Female version of Male Chauvinism and I dislike Male Chauvinists as well....

  • @TheHossUSMC The individual is the largest minority!

  • @victorsvoice, I hope Mr. Kokesh takes your excellent advise. There is no compatibility between feminism and a free society. Feminism is 100% coercion. Real libertarians about rejecting coercion. Mr. Kokesh wrongly believes (or believed) that inclusion was more important than keeping the poison out of the proverbial well.

  • hmm, really take womens lead?

    here i was thinking women and old people are the primary benifitiaries of state power, maybe it was my mistake? or nope it isnt

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more