Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Overview of Questions Surrounding the Pentagon Attack on September 11, 2001

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
9,360
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 19, 2008

The Pentagon attack is one of the most controversial aspects of that highly controversial day. This video provides an overview of what the still-unanswered questions are, and what the state of the controversy is today.

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • My big unanswered questions about 9-11.

    Where is the 757 wreckage that hit the Pentagon ?

    Where is the 757 wreckage that crashed in Philladelphia ?

    Why did WTC 7 collapse ?

    Why did the twin towers both collapse at free fall speed ?

    I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm only asking questions !

  • question...doesnt the pentagon have cameras?..if so that would show it was a plane that hit..my opinion it wasnt!!!

see all

All Comments (45)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 7:09 - is that the Pentagon ?!

    P.S. No 4 ACTA !

  • Anybody who seriously believes that 9/11 was the work of a handful of hi-hackers really needs treatment.

  • @soymuydebil (from prev)

    but as Cole again showed it can. There have also been thermitic demolition charges patented to cut steel & concrete columns. Patent No #5532449 - Murakami July 2nd '96

    Thermite charges can be used "with high efficiency, while preventing a secondary problem due to noise, flying dust & chips, & the like"

    Here's Cole's channel /user/physicsandreason

    Hope I have been of some help and if you need any more sources to confirm what i said, just ask

  • @soymuydebil (from prev)

    barium is a highly toxic metal & is not used in paint. Also paint isnt explosive

    Dr F Greening tried to theorize that the sulphur came from the WTC drywall as it sat in the rubble. But after numerous experiments by AE911Truth engineer Jonathan Cole he withdrew his theory saying that "drywall just wouldn't do it"

    All these residue come from thermite. Nat Geo says thermite of any kind cannot destroy steel columns,

    (cont)

  • @soymuydebil Jones, as well as the USGS, Dr Niels Harrit, RJ Lee Group & Livermore Labs all found residues of an incendiary material called thermite. These were micro iron spheres, unreacted red-grey chips & high levels of sulphur & barium (S & B)

    When S&B are added to thermite, it reduced the melting temp of steel & is called thermate, a military grade form used for disabling abandoned artillery. Dr Gunnar Ries has tried to say this is primer paint used on steel (Golden Gate Bridge) but

    (cont)

  • @soymuydebil (from prev)

    However, orange/yellow molten metal was recorded coming out of WTC2 7min before collapse. Prof Steven Jones determined this metal to be iron by the method of 'Planck's Law'. NIST tried to claim it was molten aluminium (AL) from the plane or WTC skin, mixed with office furnishings, but Jones also proved that molten AL is silver when poured in the air & won't mix with organic material due to its density, they simply burn on it.

    Watch this video /watch?v=3PawC4u1U7k

    (cont)

  • @soymuydebil (from prev)

    free fell for the 8 stories (100ft). For a building to go from motionless to free fall instantly, there is only 1 explanation. I don't understand your 'no downward pressure' statement, can you explain please.

    In an normal office fire, temps do not reach high enough to melt steel, even with added jet fuel. At 800C, steel does lose 80-90% of its strength, but as proved by British Steel in 95 & other steel building fires in history, it doesn't collapse.

    (cont)

  • @soymuydebil Some wreckage was found in the Pentagon, but non has been independently identified as 77's

    Same with U93. In any event of a civilian air disaster, every single piece of the aircraft if collected & put together again for the investigation

    NIST said WTC7 collapsed due to a fire (from the towers) causing column 79 to fail on floor 12, not cuz debris directly hitting it. Watch this video /watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw

    So you know, 'free fall' is measured by acceleration, not speed. WTC7

    (cont)

  • @Cornerforward There indeed was wreckage found in the pentagons facility. pieces of the fuselage, engine and landing gear.

    I can’t answer the second question due to the fact that i have not read enough about it.

    WTC 7 collapsed due to the sheer amount of debris and activity colliding with the building.

    They fell at free fall speed due to the fact that there was no downwards pressure on the building. more so the fact that the building was at 2000 degrees! the steel simply melted.

  • All you "Inside Job" people really are pathetic, parts of the plane WERE retrieved, eyewitness conformation...why do I even bother, the WTC was clearly struck by two planes and there is plenty of video footage and yet idiots still say that the building were detonated inside (get a life people and be happy you or your family were not involved in this tragic event)

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more