9/11: EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY EXCLUSIVE - AE911Truth.org Jeff Farrer Physicist 1 of 3 .m4v

AE911Truth's EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW! 1 0f 3
Physicist Jeff Farrer - one of the scientists who found thermite
in the World Trade Center dust discusses in depth his process of discovery
using the scientific method.
This interview is raw footage of one of the world class experts appearing in Architects and Engineers upcoming hard hitting documentary

Pre-Order the DVD "9/11 Experts Speak Out" September 1st 2011:
http://www.ae911truth.net/store/produ...

Buy the 9/11 Book "9/11 The Simple Facts":
http://www.ae911truth.net/store/produ...

Follow AE911TRUTH around the Web:
http://AE911truth.org/news-section/41...
http://www.911ExpertsSpeakOut.org
http://www.AE911truth.org
http://www.BuildingWhat.org
http://www.Facebook.com/ae911truth
http://www.Twitter.com/ae911truth
http://www.Youtube.com/ae911truth
http://www.Flickr.com/ae911truth
http://www.AE911truth.net/store/
http://www.AE911truth.org/911investig...

AE911Truth.org 9/11 for kids About 9/11 about 9/11 for kids About 9/11 Attacks About 9/11 for Children About 9/11 for Students About 9/11 for Teachers 9/11 for Kids 9/11 for Dummies 9/11 for Truth 9/11 for Reality Deniers 9/11 for Students 9/11 facts for kids 9/11 facts for students AE911Truth.org

• Category

  Science & Technology

[CathartikRequiem]

NIST used a computer based model to "prove" their hypothesis of a fire induced global collapse. Their model uses data that is either withheld entirely from everyone (including a licensed structural engineer who submitted a freedom of information act request to get the data, and was denied) or.....

the data that they have released....has been labeled "unrealistic" by peers.

but don't try telling youstupidmoron that....just look at his name and you'll see you're wasting your time.

[seanwalkner]

@youstupidmoron Also Building 7 was a full football field away, and the fires were on the opposite end of the building. No steel frame building prior or since has collpased from fire. take your head out of your ass.

[seanwalkner]

@youstupidmoron You are not a smart person, use some common sense. NIST has not offered a viable reason on why the towers fell, and any theh have offered have been easily shot down by scientific facts.

[Wallstrcrash2012]

Net was charge of tape he would be screaming arse off for a scientific experiment to support his narrative alibi . What a blind fool, he has chosen NIST over Isaac Newton. Who would you trust ?

[Neo Morpheus]

They are not trying to establish a new law of nature, they are just explaining some past events!

Can you imagine that in a trial, in order to prove someone guilty of murder you had to do a scientific experiment killing actual people, just to prove a murder is possible as witnessed? LOL

They just provide their conclusions based on the observed facts, that's it. An explanation of what happened, not a new law of nature.

If you want experiments, use 4B$ to build a new WTC and crash planes on it.

[youstupidmoron]

No one proved NIST wrong. You may not have noticed but two really big kerosene filled planes flew into the WTC, 7 was hit with debris and burned for seven hours without water to fight the fires. I guess you missed all that! Poor guy! You should really educate yourself before commenting! It will save you a lot of humiliation! Have a great day!

[Wallstrcrash2012]

NIST offers no physical scientific experimentation to support it's narrative conclusions. With out scientific experimentation how can you prove your hypothesis? Experimentation is the only way to separate the truth from the lies, otherwise you could just say what you like.

Look at WTC 7 report, there is not one experiment to support NIST narrative conclusion. Australian building professionals prove by experiment that NIST narrative conclusion is wrong.