Rory Hawes & Ben Lowrey - Sovereignty in Canada - 12th Sept 2011
Uploader Comments (benlowreyhimself)
All Comments (26)
-
Rory the name on our Birth Certificate is owned by the corporations placing us on a slave roll. Aparently anytime we use that name for our signature we unwittingly give them access to our natural borne inheritance, authority over our children and property.
-
@FREEGARYMCKINNON it's my opinion that a cestui que trust is what is set up here with me the man as benificiary of the land and resources of CANADA, and the government employees as the trustees. When we the shareholders vote, we are voting in directors to manage all our trustees.
-
@IPracticeWhatIPreach well yeah, it make sense that the person is not tied, but rather created from the birth certificate. perhaps via an intermediary foreign citus trust ? what say yee? : )
-
perhaps they have tried to imply that there is a fractional share. ?
-
@IPracticeWhatIPreach hmmm
-
@abedanger this sounds interesting ; )
My theory really seems to have stirred things up in the truth comunity. If anyone can show me how the birth certificate, is tied to a legal person using all the red numbers and letters I would be very thankful, because all I can find is speculation, and bullshit like only use the first 3 numbers so far. The name RORY DANIEL HAWES is not on any official trading forum, nor are the numbers found on my birth certificate.
IPracticeWhatIPreach 5 months ago
@IPracticeWhatIPreach
i agree rory. i did a recent video called shattering delusions and busting banking myths in which I expressed some frustrations around the birth certificate myths
benlowreyhimself 5 months ago
The knowledge the freeman movement neglects is Equity law, they tend to look at law purley on a codified basis and think they cannot act without complete understanding, as if they get a 0 or 1 wrong the whole thing will blow up their face.
Equity is the superior law but its never mentioned by neither freemen movement or within society as a whole.
Danster82 5 months ago
@Danster82
i don't know where you equity guys think that "at law" means codes/legislation. it doesn't.
benlowreyhimself 5 months ago