Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Amy Marlene Robichaud for Canada's Next Great Prime Minister

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
3,730
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 26, 2008

My name is Amy Marlene Robichaud & this is my entry for Canada's Next Great Prime Minister. In order to make Canada a stronger country socially, economically & politically I believe that Canada needs to be a stronger democracy. I have a 3 step plan to give Canadians a greater voice in government that includes: Senate reform, better federal-provincial relations, & what I call "Value for Votes" accountability for Members of Parliament.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 11 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (AmyMarlene)

  • Joseph,

    The second phase of my plan is all about creating a meaningful dialogue that will result in successful constitutional reform for an elected Senate. I'm sorry if you didn't find that to be clear in my video.

  • Hello Amy, IT takes a lot of courage do to this. Just one question, under the Constitution Act of 82, Art. 38(1)(b) it states that to amend art. 44, it would take the support of the Senate, the house of commons, and 7 provinces as well as 50% of the voters of Canada. Keeping in mind that no former amendment to the Constitution Act of '82 has ever succeeded (Meech accord,Charlottetown accord), how would you propose to achieve this?? Once again, kudos!If you can answer, you have my vote

  • As for the Senate reforms that have to do with seat allocation and how to select the Senators, you are quite correct that article 38 would have to be employed. I realize this is a daunting task to gain the mass support of Canadian's & the provincial governments. That is why I called for the creation of a Royal Commission to investigate the best election mechanisms & seat allocation for Senators. The Royal Commission will provide the provinces & Canadians with a platform to investigate & debate

  • new potential incarnations of the Senate. It will allow for political will to be mobilized & a consensus to be reached. A Royal Commission is mobile & public & removed from immediate partisan concerns so will be a much better forum for reaching consensus on Senate reform than any parliamentary committee.

    I believe that the constitution can be amended in this way. 1982 was the last time our leaders really put all their cards on the table (so to speak) in a bid to make Canada's institutional

  • (con't) stronger. Since then we haven't really taken any serious or significant efforts to better our government to strengthen our democracy, some grumbles have been issued but no serious action has been taken. I'm proposing serious action, meaningful & extensive debate & consultation on Senate reform. I believe that leaders have a role to engage with the difficult & necessary tasks of ensuring that the Constitution reflects the reality of Canada. Our leaders haven't been willing to engage since

  • 1982. Now is time. For a new Senate & for Canadian's voices to be heard anew in the Upper Chamber of parliament.

see all

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the military needs to get stronger we can get killed by a country with only the population fo 1,000,000

  • Democracy is beautiful in theory; in practice it is a fallacy. -Benito Mussolini-

  • How about, instead of supporting the continuation of our terribly undemocratic senate, you fight for an ELECTED senate?

  • Can I make a suggestion?

    You should post the link to your official CNGPM page.

    Since the judges won't be looking at youtube, you should probably direct all comments to the right site (which will hopefully be fixed soon).

    It might also help send anyone who stumbles across this on youtube onto the site to actually vote for you.

  • (con't) under section 44, because parliament has the authority to do it. We came very close to using article 44 to amend the constitution with bill S-4 in 2007. The main reason this did not occur is that Senator's were skeptical of what the next steps of reform would be. My plan clearly outlines the next steps for long term reform so I believe that parliament can come to a majority decision to implement the short term reforms that I have advocated.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more